|
|
The Jewish Nakba
by Ben-Dror Yemini
Ma'ariv, May 16, 2009
They say that she was stunningly beautiful.
Sol (Suleika) Hatuel was 17 years old when she was beheaded. A Muslim
friend claimed that she had succeeded in converting her. When Sol denied
the claim, she was accused of renouncing Islam and was condemned to death.
Her case reached the sultan.
In order to prevent her death, the community elders tried
to persuade her to live as a Muslim. She refused and said, "I was
born as a Jew, I will die as a Jew." Her fate was sealed. It happened
in 1834. She was from Tangier and was executed in Fez. Many make pilgrimages
to her grave. Despite the fact that the incident was immortalized in eyewitness
testimony, in a famous painting and in a play, her story has been forgotten.
The following article is dedicated to her and to the victims of the Jewish
Nakba.
***
Every year on the 15th of May, the Palestinians— and
many others around the world along with them— "celebrate"
Nakba Day. For them, this is the day that marks the great catastrophe
that befell them as result of the establishment of the State of Israel.
Hundreds of thousands of Arabs became refugees. Some fled, some were deported.
The Nakba grew to such enormous proportions that it is preventing a solution
to the dispute.
We must remember that in the 1940s, population exchanges
and deportations for the purpose of creating national states were the
accepted norm. Tens of millions of people experienced it, but only the
Palestinians (and they are not alone in this) have been inflating the
myth of the Nakba.
However, there is another Nakba: the Jewish
Nakba. During those same years, there was a long line of slaughters, pogroms,
property confiscation of and deportations against Jews in Islamic countries.
This chapter of history has been left in the shadows. The Jewish Nakba
was worse than the Palestinian Nakba. The only difference is that the
Jews did not turn that Nakba into their founding ethos. To the contrary.
Like tens of millions of other refugees around the world,
they preferred to heal the wound. Not to scratch it and not to open it
and not to make it bleed even more. The Palestinians, in contrast, preferred
bleeding to rehabilitation. And now they are also paying the price.
The industry of lies has intensified the myth of the Nakba
and turned it into the ultimate crime. The Nakba has spawned innumerable
publications and conferences, to the point of completely distorting the
actual historical process. The Deir Yassin massacre has become one of
the milestones in the Palestinian Nakba. There is no need to hide what
occurred there (even though the issue of the massacre is in dispute).
Innocent people were killed. There were a few other instances of behavior
that should be exposed and condemned.
EXTERMINATION WAR AGAINST THE JEWS
A long series of massacres was perpetrated
against the Jews in Arab countries. They did not declare war on the countries
in which they lived. They were loyal citizens. That did not help them.
Their suffering was erased. Their story is never told. The Palestinian
narrative has taken over history. There is no need for a Palestinian narrative
versus a Zionist narrative. We need to shake off narratives in favor of
the truth. And the truth is the number of Jews murdered was greater, their
dispossession was greater, and their suffering greater...
A stunning testimonial from those years, which actually
comes from the Arab side, sheds light on the issue. In 1936, Alawite notables
sent a letter to the French Foreign Minister in which they expressed their
concern for the future of the region. They also referred to the Jewish
question: "The Jews brought civilization and peace to the Arab Muslims,
and they dispersed gold and prosperity over Palestine without damage to
anyone or taking anything by force. Despite this, the Muslims declared
holy war against them and didn't hesitate to massacre their children and
women... Thus, a black fate awaits the Jews in case the Mandates are cancelled
and Muslim Syria united with Muslim Palestine". The interesting thing
is that one of the letter's signatories was none other than the great
grandfather of Bashar Al Assad, the president of Syria.
We must remember that Nakba Day is the date of the declaration
of Israel's independence, May 15th. We must remember what happened just
a few hours after that declaration. The Secretary of the Arab League,
Abdul Rahman Hassan Azzamaha, announced the declaration of war against
Israel: "This war will be a war of annihilation and the story of
the slaughter will be told like the campaigns of the Mongols and the Crusaders."
The Mufti, Haj Amin Al Husseini, who was
close to Hitler during the Second World War, added his own bit: "I
am declaring a holy war. My brother Muslims! Slaughter the Jews! Kill
them all!" The mini-Holocaust of the Jews in Arab countries.
Various documents, some of them discovered only in recent
years, show that the declaration of war was far broader. It was actually
a declaration of war on the Jews.
Research that was conducted, among others, by Prof. Irwin
Cotler, former Minister of Justice of Canada, shows that the Arab League
formulated a bill that would place a series of sanctions on the Jews,
including confiscation of property, bank accounts and more. The preamble
to the bill states that "All Jews will be considered members of the
Jewish minority in the State of Palestine." And if the fate of the
Jews of Palestine was sealed, the fate of the Jews in Arab countries was
clear.
The bill was indeed the background to the sanctions against
the Jews in Arab countries - sometimes by way of legislation, as happened
in Iraq and later in Egypt, and sometimes by taking those measures without
the need for any legislation.
According to the industry of lies, the Jews in Arab countries
lived peacefully in their environment, under the protection of the government,
and it was only because of the Zionist movement and the harm done to the
Arabs in Palestine that the Jews began to suffer.
This lie has been repeated innumerable times.
Most of the Jews in Arab countries did not undergo the horrors of the
Holocaust. But, even before the advent of Zionism, their situation was
not any better. There were periods in which the Jews enjoyed relative
peace under Muslim rule, but those periods were the exception. Throughout
Jewish history in Muslim lands there were humiliations, expulsions, pogroms
and a systematic deprivation of rights.
SERIES OF POGROMS
We can, of course, start with the conflict between Muhammad
and the Jews. Muhammed undertook social reforms, bringing the Arabs out
of the Jahaliya period, and borrowed the concept of monotheism - primarily,
perhaps, from the Jews. Many motifs from the Jewish religion appear in
the Koran, for example, circumcision and the prohibition on eating pork.
But Muhammad wanted to convert the Jews, They, of course, refused. The
result was a confrontation that ended in the expulsion and slaughter of
hundreds.
The Jews, as the "People of the Book," were given the right
to live under the protection of Islam and to practice their religion.
From time to time, from generation to generation, the conditions underwent
changes. In many cases, the Jews lived under the covenant of Khalif Omar.
This covenant enabled them to live as protected people ("Dhimmis"),
albeit with inferior status. But many times, under Muslim rule, they were
not even allowed a life of inferior status.
THE GOLDEN AGE
One of the proofs of the coexistence of Jews and Muslims
is Jewish prosperity under Muslim rule in Spain and the Golden Age. The
reality, however, was different.
It encompassed continued violence against
the Jews. In 1011 in Cordoba, Spain, under Muslim rule, there were pogroms
in which, according to various estimates, from hundreds to thousands were
murdered. In 1066 in Granada, Yosef Hanagid was executed, along with between
4,000 and 6,000 other Jews. One of the worst periods of all began in 1148,
when the Almohad dynasty came to power (al Muwahhid®±n), and
ruled Spain and North Africa during the 12th and 13th centuries.
MOROCCO
Morocco was the Arab country that suffered from the worst
series of massacres of Jews. In the 8th century whole communities were
wiped out by Idris the First. In 1033, in the city of Fez, 6,000 Jews
were murdered by a Muslim mob. The rise of the Almohad dynasty caused
waves of mass murders. According to testimony from that time, 100,000
Jews were slaughtered in Fez and about 120,000 in Marrakesh (this testimony
should be viewed with caution). In 1465, another massacre took place in
Fez, which spread to other cities in Morocco.
There were pogroms in Tetuan in 1790 and 1792, in which
children were murdered, women were raped and property was looted. Between
1864 and 1880, there were a series of pogroms against the Jews of Marrakesh,
in which hundreds were slaughtered. In 1903, there were pogroms in two
cities - Taza and Settat, in which over 40 Jews were killed.
In 1907, there was a pogrom in Casablanca
in which 30 Jews were killed and many women were raped. In 1912, there
was another massacre in Fez in which 60 Jews were killed and about 10,000
were left homeless. In 1948, another series of pogroms began against the
Jews which led to the slaughter of 42 in the cities of Oujda and Jrada.
ALGERIA
A series of massacres occurred in Algeria in 1805, 1815
and 1830. The situation of the Jews improved with the start of the French
conquest in 1830, but that did not prevent anti-Jewish outbursts in the
1880s. The situation deteriorated again with the rise of the Vichy government.
Even before 1934, the country was permeated by Nazi influences, which
led to the slaughter of 25 Jews in the city of Constantine. When it achieved
independence in 1962, laws were passed against citizenship for anyone
who was not a Muslim and their property was effectively confiscated. Most
of the Jews left, usually completely penniless, together with the French
("pieds noirs").
LIBYA
In 1785, hundreds of Libyan Jews were murdered by Burza
Pasha. Under Nazi influence, harassment of the Jews intensified. Jewish
property in Benghazi was plundered, thousands were sent to camps and about
500 Jews were killed. In 1945, at the end of World War II, a program against
the Jews began and the number of murdered reached 140. The New York Times
reported the horrible scenes of babies and old people who had been beaten
to death. In the riots that broke out in 1948, the Jews were more prepared,
so only 14 were killed. Following the Six Day War, riots broke out once
again and 17 Jews were slaughtered.
IRAQ
A massacre occurred in Basra in 1776. The situation of the
Iraqi Jews improved under British rule in 1917, but this improvement ended
with Iraq's independence in 1932. German influences increased and reached
a peak in 1941 in the pogrom known as Farhud, in which 182 Jews were slaughtered
(according to historian Elie Kedourie, 600 people were actually murdered)
and thousands of houses were pillaged.
Those were the days of Haj Amin al Husseini,
who preached violence against the Jews. After the establishment of the
State of Israel, the Iraqi parliament acted according to the Arab League
bill and in 1950 and froze the assets of Jews. Sanctions were imposed
on those who remained in Iraq. The Farhud massacre and the harassment
from 1946 to 1949 to all intents and purposes turned the Iraqi Jews into
exiles and refugees. The few thousand who remained in Iraq suffered from
harsh edicts. In 1967, 14 Iraqis were sentenced to death on trumped up
charges of espionage. Among them were 11 Jews. Radio Iraq invited the
masses to the hanging festivities.
SYRIA
The first blood libel in a Muslim country occurred in Syria
in 1840, and led to the kidnapping and torture of dozens of Jewish children,
sometimes to the point of death, and a pogrom against the Jews. In 1986,
the Syrian Minister of Defense, Mustafa Talas, published a book, "The
Matzah of Zion," in which he claims that the Jews did, indeed, use
the blood of a Christian monk to bake matzah. Same old anti-Semitism,
new edition. Other pogroms occurred in Aleppo in 1850 and in 1875, in
Damascus in 1848 and in 1890, in Beirut in 1862 and in 1874, and in Dir
al Kamar there was another blood libel which also led to a pogrom in 1847.
That year, there was a pogrom against the Jews of Jerusalem, which was
the result of that blood libel. In 1945, the Jews of Aleppo suffered severe
pogroms. 75 Jews were murdered and the community was destroyed. There
was a resurgence of the violence in 1947, which turned most of the Syrian
Jews into refugees. Those who remained there lived for many years as hostages.
IRAN
There was a pogrom against the Jews of Mashhad in Iran in
1839. A mob was incited to attack Jews, and slaughtered almost 40. The
rest were forced to convert. That is how the Marranos of Mashhad came
into being. In 1910, there was a blood libel in Shiraz in which 30 Jews
were murdered and all Jewish homes were pillaged.
YEMEN
There were fluctuations in relations in
Yemen that ranged between tolerance and inferior subsistence, between
harassment and pogroms. The Rambam's Letter to Yemen was sent following
a letter he received from the leader of the Yemeni Jews, describing edicts
of forced conversion issued against the Jews (1173). There were further
waves of apostasy edicts which cannot be detailed here for lack of space.
One of the worst milestones was the Mawza exile. Three years
after Imam Al Mahdi took power in 1676, he drove the Jews into one of
the most arid districts of Yemen. According to various accounts, 60 -
75% of the Jews died as a result of the exile. Many and varied edicts
were imposed on the Jews, differing only in severity. One of the harshest
was the Orphans' Edict, which ordered the forced conversion of orphaned
children to Islam. In nearby Aden, which was under British rule, pogroms
occurred in 1947 which took the lives of 82 Jews. 106 of the 170 shops
that were owned by Jews were completely destroyed. Hundreds of houses
and all the community's buildings were burned down.
EGYPT
As in the other Arab countries, the Jews of Egypt also suffered
inferior status for hundreds of years. A significant improvement occurred
when Muhammad Ali came to power in 1805. The testimony of French diplomat,
Edmond Combes, leaves nothing in doubt: "To the Muslims, no race
is more worthy of contempt than the Jewish race." Another diplomat
added, "The Muslims do not hate any other religion the way they hate
that of the Jews."
Following the blood libel in Damascus, similar libels began
to spread in Egypt as well and incited mobs to carry out a series of attacks:
in Cairo in 1844, 1890, and in 1901-1902; and Alexandria in 1870, 1882
and in 1901-1907. Similar attacks also occurred in Port Said and in Damanhur.
Later on, there were riots against the
Jews at the end of World War II, in 1945, in which 10 were killed and
hundreds were injured. In 1947, the Companies Law was passed, which severely
damaged Jewish businesses and led to the confiscation of property. In
1948, following the UN resolution on partition, riots began in Cairo and
Alexandria. The dead numbered between 80 and 180. Tens of thousands were
forced to leave, many fleeing and abandoning their property. The lot of
those who remained did not improve. In 1956, a law was passed in Egypt
which effectively denied the Jews citizenship, forcing them to leave the
country with no property. This was an act of pure expulsion and mass property
confiscation.
***
The above is just a partial list out of a long series of
massacres in Muslim countries. It happened before the Zionist endeavor.
It continued with the Zionist endeavor. We are talking about a succession
of events. Tens of thousands were murdered simply because they were Jewish.
So the fairytale of coexistence and blaming Zionism for undermining that
coexistence is yet another completely baseless myth.
Before the UN vote on partition in November 1947, Egypt's
ambassador to the UN, Heykal Pasha, warned that "The lives of a million
Jews in Muslim countries will be in danger if the vote is for partition...
if Arab blood is spilled in Palestine, Jewish blood will be spilled elsewhere
in the world."
Four days afterwards, the Iraqi foreign minister, Muhammad
Fadil al Jamali said that "We will not be able to restrain the masses
in the Arab countries, after the harmony in which Jews and Arabs lived
together." There was no harmony. There had been a massacre of Jews
just a few years earlier. El Jamali lied, of course. The very same Iraqi
government had encouraged the harassment of Jews and issued orders to
confiscate all Jewish property.
Additionally, the Iraqi leader of the time,
Nuri Said, had already presented a plan for expelling the Jews in 1949,
even before the hasty - actually forced - exit of the Jews from Iraq.
He also explained that "The Jews are a source of trouble in Iraq.
They have no place among us. We must get rid of them as best we were able."
Said even presented a plan to lead the Jews via Jordan in order to coerce
them into passage to Israel. Jordan objected, but the expulsion was implemented
anyway. Said even admitted that this entailed a type of population exchange.
So the massacres, the pogroms and the great expulsion of
the Jews was a continuation of their suffering under Muslim rule. There
have always been Muslims who came out in defense of the Jews. They are
also worthy of mention. That were also periods of prosperity, but it appears
that most of the Jewish prosperity, as in Egypt in the 1920s and 1930s,
in Algeria in the 19th and 20th centuries, in Iraq in the 1920s - was
under colonial rule. In most cases, the situation of the Jews was bad
before the European invasion and worsened once again with the end of the
colonial era.
* * *
Throughout the relations between Jews and Arabs, in Arab
countries or in the course of the Zionist enterprise, there was not one
case of a pogrom against Muslims of the type committed by the Arabs against
the Jews. Even in the worst cases, which must be condemned, such as Deir
Yassin, they occurred as part of a military confrontation.
Those are cases that should be condemned,
but we need to put things in perspective. The Arabs slaughtered the Jews
without any hostilities and without any military excuse, just because
they were Jews. And those few Arabs who were killed, were killed as part
of a military campaign. Despite this, any injury inflicted on the Arab
population resulted in innumerable investigations and references. The
worst abuse of all, the abuse of Jews by Arabs, was erased and forgotten.
Let's return to Deir Yassin, the ultimate symbol of the
Nakba. We have called it an indecent act and we will repeat that. But
we must note that it was preceded by a series of murderous terrorist attacks
against the civilian population. Waves of incidents, which to all intents
and purposes were actual pogroms, by an incited mob that attacked the
civilian population. Thousands of Jews were slaughtered - women, children
and the elderly. The Palestinians even murdered their own people. In the
great Arab Revolt in the 1930s, 400 Jews and 5,000 Arabs were killed,
most of them at the hands of their brethren.
The months before Deir Yassin were the worst of all. 39
workers were murdered at the Haifa refineries, 50 Jews were killed by
car bombs in Jerusalem, and on and on. In total, in the four months between
the vote on partition and the declaration of establishment of the State
of Israel, 815 Jews were murdered, most of them before the Deir Yassin
incident (on April 9, 1948), some afterwards (the slaughter of the Hadassah
hospital convoy: 79 killed, April 13, 1948). Most were civilians. Most
died in massacres and terrorist attacks. And that is the real background.
Far more murdered Jews. But they have all been forgotten. They should
be mentioned. That is the Jewish Nakba, whose victims, in Israel and around
the world, are mentioned less and less.
The Palestinians paid the price: Close to a million Jews
lived in Arab countries at the time of the establishment of the State
of Israel. Just a few live there today. Most left because they suffered
from pogroms and the threat to their lives. It was a crueler expulsion
than the one suffered by the Arabs of Palestine, who paid the price for
the declarations of war and annihilation made by their leaders. Even the
Jewish property that was confiscated or abandoned as a result of the expulsion
is more valuable than the Arab property that remained in Israel.
Various investigators have tried to estimate
the value of the confiscated Jewish property following the forced departure
of the Jews from Arab countries, compared with the Arab property left
in Israel following the forced departure of the Arabs. Economist Sidney
Zabludoff, an international expert in the field, estimates that the value
of the Arab property is $3.9 billion, compared with the value of the Jewish
property which is $6 billion (at 2007 values).
So even in this area, the Palestinians' claims are refuted.
They dragged the Arab countries into war. They paid the price. And they
are the ones who caused the Jews to pay an even higher price. Both in
property and in blood.
This article is not intended to cultivate the Jewish Nakba,
and it by no means includes all the cases of pogroms, property confiscations,
forced conversions and other harassment. The purpose is precisely the
opposite. When they understand, in the Arab world in general, and the
Palestinians in particular, that suffering, expulsion, loss of property,
the cost in lives, is not the monopoly of one side, they may, perhaps,
have the sense to understand that this past is a matter for history lessons.
Because if we start to perform a political accounting, they have an overdraft.
The Jewish Nakba was far greater. The suffering was enormous. But it is
the suffering of many nations, Jews and Arabs among them, who went through
the experience as part of the creation of new nation states.
It is therefore worth presenting the story of the Jewish
Nakba. Not for the purpose of increasing the hostility, but for the purpose
of presenting the truth, and for the purpose of reconciliation between
the nations. Inshallah.
Facts and Logic About the Middle East
P.O. Box 590359
San Francisco, CA 94159
Gerardo Joffe, President
Return to top of page>>
|
|