Terror Stings Its Pal, the U.N.:
The world body has fed a monster that now
threatens it and everyone else.
Alan M. Dershowitz, prolific writer, professor of law
at Harvard University, is (almost) always right on as far as Israel
is
concerned. Here he shows up persuasively the hypocrisy of the United
Nations, certainly as far as Israel is concerned. It seems to be the
major preoccupation
of the UN, especially in the General Assembly. We ourselves have written
several hasbarah messages on this topic. Please refer to our message
#74
("The UN and Israel") in this website and others.
Gerardo Joffe, President
Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz's most recent
book is "The Case for Israel" (John Wiley & Sons, 2003).
[Now available from the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies for $2 off
price of $19.95 + $3 postage and handling. Book review coming shortly]
by Alan Dershowitz
August 27, 2003
Several days ago I received a phone call from a Brazilian
journalist who asked me to respond to the charge being made in her home
country that Israel was at least indirectly to blame for the deadly truck
bombing of the United Nations headquarters in Baghdad that killed, among
others, a prominent Brazilian diplomat, Sergio Vieira de Mello.
I was not surprised at the question, considering its source.
Among many South Americans, as among many Eastern Europeans, the knee-jerk
response to nearly every evil is "blame it on the Jews." For
example, Cardinal Oscar Andres Rodriguez Meridiaga, the archbishop of
Tegucigalpa, Honduras, has blamed the "Jewish media" for the
scandal involving Catholic priests having sex with young parishioners.
But the question got me to thinking: Who does share the
blame with the terrorists themselves for the horrific explosion that killed
and injured so many innocent people? Although the primary culprit is clearly
the terrorist group that planned and executed the mass murder, the secondary
culprit is the U.N. itself.
For more than a quarter of a century, the U.N. has actively
encouraged terrorism by rewarding its primary practitioners, legitimating
it as a tactic, condemning its victims when they try to defend themselves
and describing the murderers of innocent children as "freedom fighters."
No organization in the world today has accorded so much legitimacy to
terrorism as has the U.N.
Consider the following:
. There are numerous occupied peoples around the world
seeking statehood or national liberation, including the Tibetans, Kurds,
Turkish Armenians and Palestinians. Only one of these groups has received
official recognition by the U.N., including observer status and invitations
to speak and participate in committee work. That group is the one that
invented and perfected modern international terrorism namely, the
Palestinians.
These rewards were first bestowed in the 1970s when the
Palestine Liberation Organization was unabashedly committed to terrorism.
In fact, Chairman Yasser Arafat was invited to speak to the U.N. General
Assembly in 1974 at a time when his organization was seeking to destroy
a member-state of the U.N. by terrorism.
By rewarding Arafat and the PLO for such behavior, the U.N.
made it clear that the best way to ensure that your cause is leapfrogged
ahead of others is to adopt terrorism as your primary means of protest.
The Tibetans, whose land has been occupied more brutally and for a longer
period than the Palestinians, but who have never practiced terrorism,
cannot even receive a hearing from the U.N.
The U.N. has for years refused to condemn terrorism
unequivocally, while encouraging and upholding "the legitimacy of
the struggle for national liberation movements" against "occupation"
in other words, the use of terrorism against innocent civilians
to resist occupation. This has sent the message to aggrieved groups that
terrorism is legitimate.
The U.N. has allowed Palestinian terrorists to use
U.N.-sponsored "refugee camps" like Jenin as terrorist bases.
This has sent the message to the world that the U.N. closes its eyes to
terrorism.
The U.N. has repeatedly condemned efforts by Israel
to prevent and respond to terrorism. For example, the Security Council
condemned Israel for isolating Arafat in the West Bank last year, even
after it was proved that Arafat remained complicit in acts of terrorism.
This has sent the message to the victims of terrorism that
if they fight back they risk sanctions.
The U.N. has allowed states such as Syria that sponsor
terrorism to sit on the Security Council and to chair important committees,
while denying Israel these same rights. This has sent the message that
the U.N. applies a double standard when it comes to terrorism.
The bottom line is that the U.N. has served as an international
megaphone for the perverse message that any people who feel that they
are occupied have the right to resist occupation by randomly murdering
innocent civilians anywhere in the world.
Now the chickens have come home to roost. Some Iraqis, who
feel that they are now occupied, have taken the U.N.'s message to heart
and are engaged in a "national liberation movement" of the kind
long praised by the U.N. and are using the tactics rewarded by the U.N.
against that very organization.
Now that the victims of "national liberation terrorism"
are U.N. employees instead of Jewish babies, maybe the U.N. will finally
come to its senses and understand that by legitimating and rewarding terrorism,
they have created a Frankenstein monster that can be turned against any
nation, organization or group. Unless there is a change, no one will be
safe from this U.N.-created, -fed and -rewarded monster that threatens
the entire world.
Facts and Logic About the Middle East
P.O. Box 590359
San Francisco, CA 94159
Gerardo Joffe, President
Return to top of page>>
|