Letter to the editor of
The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs:
June 25, 2002
In the current issue of your publication, you re-open
the matter of the USS LIBERTY, a terrible event that occurred 35 years
ago.
I would have thought that this matter had been laid to
rest. It has been copiously documented that the Israelis attacked the
ship in the heat of battle and as a consequence of a number of tragic
mistakes due to intelligence failures.
The whole episode was examined and analyzed in complete
detail in The Atlantic Monthly of September 1984 ("The Attack
on the LIBERTY").
I can make the article available to you, if you wish.
As you know, of course, the Israeli government, without
admitting culpability of any kind, compensated the U.S. government for
damage to the ship and also compensated the crew members who were wounded
and the families of the crew members who were killed.
A question could be raised as to what legitimate reason the USS LIBERTY
had to be where it was, in the middle of a raging battle.
You should perhaps show more understanding for the dreadful
things, including "friendly fire," that occur in war, often
due to faulty intelligence.
Without going too deeply back into history, let me remind
you of the intelligence error, not so long ago, of our pilots bombing
the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade and of the hundreds of civilians we killed
by other intelligence errors in the "Kosovo action." That is,
of course, in addition to the hundreds, perhaps thousands, killed as "collateral
damage" in our current involvement in Afghanistan.
And I am sure that you remember the tragic incident, not
too many years ago in which, in peacetime, trigger-happy personnel of
the USS VINCENNES shot down a commercial Iranian airliner, killing over
200 innocent people.
I also want to remind you of the Iraqi fighter plane that
attacked the USS STARK in the Persian Gulf, also in peacetime, and killed
almost exactly as many navy personnel as were killed in the USS LIBERTY
incident.
The Iraqis told us to fly a kite and never paid a penny
of compensation to anybody.
But nobody talks about these matters, certainly not The Washington
Report on Middle East Affairs.
Those who continue to be obsessed with the USS LIBERTY
after all these years and with Israels alleged "perfidy"
might perhaps have another agenda. What could it be?
Sincerely yours,
Gerardo Joffe, President
UPDATE:
The editors of The Washington Report on Middle
East Affairs have responded, in their August 2002 issue, as follows:
How about the truth. To begin with, one
can only "re-open" something if it first has been closed. What
the USS LIBERTY survivors and their families are seeking above all is
a full congressional hearing on the Israeli attack. All the other incidents
you cite were so investigated only the LIBERTY attack was not.
Why do you think that is the case?
FLAME, as usual, appears more interested in attacking
America and protecting Israel than in the facts. Among the facts you ignore
are: Fact one Israel has never admitted that its assault was deliberate.
Fact two The LIBERTY was in international waters away from the
fighting. The only "heat of battle" the LIBERTY found itself
in was Israel's attack on it. Fact three The LIBERTY was flying
a U.S. flag clearly visible to aircraft. Equally important is the reason
for the U.S. cover-up of Israel's culpability. Until these issues are
resolved, the Washington Report will continue to examine the attack, as
we do in the current issue on p.29.
Finally, we wonder if you may not be engaged in
a cover-up of your own: could it be that FLAME in fact stands for "Fabrications
and Lies About the Middle East"?
Dear FLAME reader: Should you wish to contact
The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, you may reach them
by fax at 202-265-4574.
|