Peace will never
come about as long as the Arabs insist on the ‘right of return’
— a ‘right’ that can never and will never be granted. |
|
|
The “Right of Return:”
Is it a valid demand, and how would it affect
Middle-East peace?
Three years ago, President Clinton and Ehud Barak,
then Prime Minister of Israel, made every effort to achieve final peace
between Jews and Arabs. They offered the “Palestinians” 97
per cent of the “West Bank” and Gaza, the eastern part of
Jerusalem as their capital, and $30 billion in refugee compensation. But
Yasser Arafat did not accept this overly generous offer. He insisted on
the “right of return,” flooding Israel with as many as five
million so-called “refugees.” When this outrageous demand
was not granted, he broke off negotiations and started his bloody intifida,
the war against Israel, which by now has killed about 2,000 people on
both sides and has left many thousands more wounded, many of them crippled
for life.
What are the facts?
Who are the so-called “refugees?”
On the very day that Israel declared its independence, five Arab states
invaded the nascent Jewish state. In fiery broadcasts and confident of
victory, their leaders urged the Arabs to flee the war zone, so as not
to impede the invading armies. Once victory was achieved and after all
the Jews had been killed or had fled, the Arabs could return, reclaim
their property and loot that of the Jews.
Things didn’t turn out that way. About 600,000 Arabs
followed the call of their leaders and became refugees. About 200,000
accepted the promises of the Israeli authorities that they would not be
harmed and that they would become citizens of the new state, with the
same rights as the Jews. Hardly any of the original refugees are still
alive. But those who claim to be their descendants (who astonishingly
number as many as five million), clamor to “return” to Israel.
With the single exception of Jordan, none of their Arab brethren have
allowed them to settle in their countries and to become citizens. They
have confined them to squalid refugee camps, supported by UNWRA (a dependency
of the U.N. and financed mostly by the USA). Those refugee camps are seething
hotbeds of hatred against Israel and are the sources for terrorists and
suicide bombers.
Is the Palestinian “refugee” problem
unique? Migrations of populations are nothing new in world history,
especially after major wars. About 15 million Germans were (often brutally)
expelled from what became western Poland, from what used to be East Prussia
and from the Sudetenland. Millions of Muslims and Hindus, following bloody
battles, migrated to India and to what became Pakistan. Other major migrations
following the World Wars were those of the French from Algeria, Armenians,
Turks, Greeks, Cypriots, Kurds and others. It is only the “Palestinians”
who insist on being “repatriated.” But more to the point,
Israel has absorbed over 600,000 Jews who were expelled from Arab countries
and millions of others from all over the world. All of them are productive
citizens of their new country.
Since the founding of Israel in 1948, the Arabs have waged
unrelenting wars to defeat the Jewish state, but they have been unable
to do so by military means. The destruction of Israel, however, remains
a cornerstone of the PLO charter, which has never been rescinded. What
the Arabs have failed to achieve by force of arms they are now determined
to accomplish demographically, by flooding Israel with millions of “Palestinians.”
The “right of return” is the one concession
that Israel can never grant and can never accept. The world must not forget
that Israel was founded for one purpose only, namely to be the home of
the Jewish people. Even today, more than twenty per cent of the population
of Israel are Arabs, almost all of them hostile and a potential fifth
column. Even if only a fraction of those who claim the “right of
return” were indeed to come to Israel, the country would be swamped
by Arabs, and Israel would cease to exist as a Jewish state.
According to the U.N., only those who “owing to a
well-founded fear of being persecuted in their home countries…”
are considered “refugees.” For instance, the Cubans who fled
Castro are considered refugees, but their children and grandchildren living
in Miami are not. Only the “Palestinians” have been granted
special status by the U.N., by which all of their descendants, for generations
to come, are considered “refugees.” The purpose of this special
status is to assist in the destruction of Israel. Israel is prepared to
pay huge amounts in (unwarranted) compensation to those “refugees.”
But under no circumstances will it ever or should it ever accept the “right
of return.” What that would accomplish in one stroke would be the
destruction of Israel as a Jewish state. Israel will never allow that
to happen and the world should not request it either. The problem has
to be solved by settling the “refugees” in any or all of the
22 Arab countries. Peace will never come about as long as the Arabs insist
on the “right of return” — a “right” that
can never and will never be granted.
This ad has been published and paid for by
Facts and Logic About the Middle East
P.O. Box 590359
San Francisco, CA 94159
Gerardo Joffe, President
Return to top of page>>
|
|