The stakes are high,
but the road is clear. Unless Israel ... reasserts its position of
strength, todays intifada, todays war of attrition with
the Palestinians, is going to lead to full-scale war in the region. |
|
|
War in the Middle East
Can it happen? How can it be avoided?
The Arab uprising in Israel, the "Al Aksa
Intifada", has now been going on since September of last year. Hundreds
have died and thousands have been wounded. What is happening has all the
earmarks of a civil war. But it isn't just the Palestinians that Israel
is confronted with. All of the Arab world and Iran are backing the Palestinians
and are goading them on. Any spark could trigger a full-fledged war
which, in all likelihood, would result in all of the Arab states and Iran
lined up against Israel.
What are the facts?
Israeli forbearance. Under the guidance of former
president Clinton, and in order to put an end to the long struggle with
the Palestinians, former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak made breakthrough
offers to Yasser Arafat he offered him the moon, "concessions"
that would not have been conceivable at any time before. But Arafat, primarily
interested in "armed struggle", rejected those unprecedented
offers out of hand, and instead instructed his people to engage Israel
in violent conflict. Israel, in the face of this violence, has shown remarkable
restraint, despite our Secretary of State's unbelievable remark that Israel
was using "excessive force". "Excessive force"? What
would we Americans do if, say, Mexican insurgents, with the support of
their government, lobbed mortar rounds into San Diego or El Paso, or dispatched
suicide bombers into our major cities causing hundreds of casualties?
You know the answer!
The last time America faced a threat from a neighboring nation was in
1916, when an incursion by Pancho Villa killed seventeen Americans. The
U.S. promptly sent an army of 6,000 men into Mexico to capture Villa.
Can Israel be expected to be patient with Arafat much longer, before he
is subjected to the treatment meted out to Pancho Villa?
The sham of the Oslo Agreement. Even the most sanguine
can no longer believe that the heralded "Oslo Peace Process",
sealed by a handshake between the late Israeli prime minister Yitzhak
Rabin and Yasser Arafat, is not one of the great failures of recent world
history. And it failed because the Palestinians, under the leadership
of Yasser Arafat, have broken virtually every clause of the Oslo Accord
from forming a standing army of at least 45,000 men, to smuggling
heavy weapons into their arsenals, to releasing and failing to arrest
terrorists who have committed murderous outrages against innocent Israeli
citizens. And the Palestinians are not at all interested in a Palestinian
state alongside Israel. They are only interested in a Palestinian state
instead and in place of Israel Palestine, as they put it, "from
the River to the Sea". That goal, at least for now, cannot be attained
by conventional military means. So the strategy is to attempt to destroy
Israel by a low-level war of attrition, by insisting on the "right
of return" of the (by now swollen to almost four million) "refugees",
and (the great hope) by ultimately sparking a general war, in which the
Arabs and the Iranians would finally be able to drive the hated Jews into
the sea and into final oblivion the same goal with which Abdel
Nasser of Egypt sparked the 1967 Six-Day War.
How can such an outcome, such a war, be prevented? For the
longest time, Israel has tried to appease the Arabs and also "world
opinion", which is almost totally critical of Israel. Israel has
voluntarily withdrawn from Lebanon and has turned virtually all of the
Gaza Strip and most of the "West Bank" over to the Palestinians.
But the Palestinians, and it seems the entire Arab world, see these accommodations
by Israel, these endless concessions, not for what they are meant to be
(namely, way stations on the road to final peace) but as indecision, loss
of will, and weakness. Smelling blood, the Arabs, just as Nasser did in
1967, are dreaming of a final assault against a weak and demoralized Israel.
Accommodations and concessions did not work and they will
not work in promoting peace. On the contrary, Israel's perceived weakness
will goad the Arabs into embarking on full-scale war. In order to avoid
such a war, Israel needs to re-assume its previous stance of deterrence.
Specifically, Ariel Sharon, whom the Israeli people chose for his proven
strength and decisiveness, should initiate policies by which, among other
actions, suicide bombers would be buried in potter's fields, rather than
being returned to their relatives, who turn their funerals into frenzied
demonstrations; freeze the financial assets of the Palestinian Authority,
of Arafat, and of the PLO; prevent P.A. officials (including Arafat) from
returning to the territory now controlled by the P.A.; permit no transportation
of people or goods beyond basic necessities; shut off utilities to the
P.A. Then he should implement the death penalty against murderers and
seize weapons from the P.A., making sure that no more weapons reach it.
He should reoccupy areas from which gunfire or missiles are shot; seize
the P.A.'s illegal offices in Jerusalem and its infrastructure and villages
from which attacks are launched; capture or otherwise dispose of P.A.
leadership. The stakes are high, but the road is clear. Unless Israel
takes steps to deter its enemies, and unless it re-asserts its position
of strength, today's intifada, today's war of attrition with the Palestinians,
is going to lead to full-scale war in the region.
This ad has been published and paid for by
Facts and Logic About the Middle East
P.O. Box 590359
San Francisco, CA 94159
Gerardo Joffe, President
Return to top of page>>
|
|