The yad chazak
the strong hand of Ariel Sharon is needed to bring peace
with security to Israel and to the Middle East. |
|
|
Ariel Sharon
Will his "yad chazakah", his strong
hand, bring peace?
Ariel ("Arik") Sharon has now been elected
Prime Minister of Israel. He decisively defeated Ehud Barak, who lost
the election even though he had close to 100% support from the Israeli
Arabs. Israel's Jews, having at long last understood the futility of the
Oslo Accord "peace process" and of the appeasement of the Palestinians,
were ready for a radical change. But Ariel Sharon is much maligned, often
called a murderer and a war criminal. There are three myths that his detractors
propagate.
What are the facts?
Myth #1: The war in Lebanon. Sharon's enemies accuse
him of having launched the "Peace for Galilee" War in Lebanon
in 1982 unnecessarily and without knowledge or permission from Prime Minister
Menachem Begin. But that is nonsense, of course. Israel, in contrast to
all Arab states, is a democratic country, governed by civilian authority.
Not even a presumed "warlord" (as Sharon is regularly titled)
could start any military action, let alone a full-blown war, without the
full approval of the government. The war in Lebanon, reviled though it
may be now, was at the time an existential necessity for Israel. An intense
and vicious civil war between the Moslems and the Christian Maronites
was going on in that country, a civil war that began in earnest when the
PLO entered Lebanon in 1970. They established their own "mini kingdom"
in that unhappy country. Over 100,000 people were killed. From their base
in Lebanon, the PLO had launched innumerable terrorist attacks against
Israel and was poised for a major invasion. When Israel "invaded"
Lebanon, the Lebanese civilians, delighted to be freed from the terror
of the PLO, greeted the Israeli soldiers as their liberators, with flowers
of happiness and hope. Sharon led his victorious troops to the outskirts
of Beirut. He refrained from entering Beirut itself only because of the
tens of thousands of casualties it would have caused, most of them Lebanese.
Under pressure of world opinion mostly, sad to say, that of the
United States he allowed Arafat and his PLO to escape to Tunis,
where they were poised to plan further mischief and destruction that destabilizes
the Middle East until today.
Myth #2: The Massacre of Sabra and Shatilla. The
gravest accusation against Ariel Sharon is that he condoned or perhaps
even instigated the massacre of about 800 Lebanese Moslems in the Sabra
and Shatilla refugee camps. The reality is that the perpetrators of this
horrific crime were Christian Falangist murderers, who by stealth invaded
these camps and acted in revenge of the assassination of Lebanon's president-elect,
Bashir Jamayel. Sharon's detractors claim that he should have been aware
of this assault or that he was aware and did nothing to prevent it. But
nobody outside the camps could have known what was happening, because
the invading Christians used no guns only knives in perpetrating
their crimes. Not a single shot was fired. Time magazine published a story
on the events, in which it clearly accused Sharon of complicity in this
horrendous crime. Sharon sued Time for libel and won. But the slander
that Sharon was responsible for the massacre has not died down and continues
to be assiduously propagated in Arab and Moslem media and also in much
of the rest of the world.
Myth #3: The "Al Aksa Intifada." The current
Intifada the bloody uprising of the Palestinians against Israel
did not, as the media like to report, start with Ariel Sharon's
visit to the Temple Mount. That visit, which had been arranged beforehand
and which had been "approved" by the Palestinian Authority,
was simply a pretext. This uprising, which could be called the "Rosh
Hashanah War of 2000", actually started days earlier, on September
23, 2000, when a Palestinian policeman killed point-blank his Israeli
counterpart, with whom he had been on patrol two days earlier. Mr. Sharon's
visit to the Temple Mount was simply the signal to start this uprising,
which voluminous intelligence proves to have been planned way in advance.
And why shouldn't Sharon, why shouldn't any Jew, be allowed to visit the
Temple Mount, which, with its Western Wall, is the holiest site for all
Jews, the focus of all their longings? Any Arab can visit any place, any
holy place, including the Western Wall, in any part of Israel without
being questioned and without being molested. What is it with the Moslems
that they go berserk if a Jew visits one of their holy sites? To blame
Sharon for provoking and starting the Al Aksa Intifada makes as little
sense as to believe that World War I would not have started had Arch Duke
Ferdinand not been assassinated in Sarajevo.
The media is mounting a smear campaign against Ariel Sharon,
describing him as an out-of-control warmonger, a man on a perpetual warpath,
someone who, if elected, would not hesitate to use troops against the
Palestinians and all other Arabs. The reality is that Israel desperately
needs Sharon. He is an Israeli hero, who played a decisive role in Israel's
brilliant victory against combined Arab might in the Six-Day War, who,
with his bold thrust into Egypt, encircled that country's Third Army in
the Yom Kippur War and thus turned near-defeat into glorious victory,
and who, in his various ministerial roles, has performed fearlessly and
most successfully. After the disastrous regime of Ehud Barak, a man who
was intimidated by President Clinton and who was putty in the hands of
Arafat, the "yad chazakah" the strong hand of Ariel Sharon
is needed to bring peace with security to Israel and to the Middle
East. The Arabs in Palestine, Syria, and all the rest will know that this
is a man that cannot be pushed around, but also that any agreements that
he will enter into will be scrupulously kept. Welcome, Arik, as Prime
Minister of Israel!
This ad has been published and paid for by
Facts and Logic About the Middle East
P.O. Box 590359
San Francisco, CA 94159
Gerardo Joffe, President
Return to top of page>>
|
|