Israel would be foolish
to make any territorial concessions at all until it can be convinced
that all Arab and Moslem countries have forsworn their enmity of Israel
and their desire to wipe it off the map. |
|
|
More About Minister Sharansky's Letter
Is he (are we) justified in being seriously
concerned?
You may have seen in this or some other publication
an advertisement featuring an open letter by former Israeli Interior Minister
Natan Sharansky to Prime Minister Ehud Barak. That advertisement was signed
by 30 Jewish leaders, from across the country and of all persuasions.
In that letter, Mr. Sharansky expressed his concern about the ever-increasing
concessions that Mr. Barak, almost single-handedly, is making to Mr. Arafat
and his Palestinians. The area of greatest concern is the almost heedless
giving away of large chunks of the Jewish homeland, in order to appease
the insatiable appetite of the Arabs.
What are the facts?
The futility of appeasement. Even though Israel (including
the "West Bank" and the Golan) is barely half the size of San
Bernardino County in California and would sink without trace in Lake Michigan,
Israel's leaders toss chunks of it away as though the country were the
size of the United States, Canada, or Russia. They do that in the futile
attempt to induce the Palestinians and the other Arabs (and non-Arab Moslems)
to make peace with the beleaguered Jewish state. But there will be no
peace, and yielding more and more territory to those who daily in their
newspapers call for the elimination of Israel is reckless and stupid.
It is almost unbelievable that a generation of Jews (or
at least a significant sector of Jewish "liberal intellectuals")
would not have learned anything from our horrible recent history. We must
look the hard facts squarely in the eye. And those hard facts are that
the Arabs (and the non-Arab Moslems) are almost single-mindedly obsessed
with the destruction of Israel. Their determination to accomplish that
is fully comparable to that of the Hitlerite Nazis. Those who refuse to
see that or to acknowledge it are fools or at least live in a haze of
wishful thinking.
Territories that have been designated as indispensable strategic
assets for the defense of Israel - the Golan Heights, the Judean-Samarian
Mountains, the Jordan Valley are carelessly offered as appeasement
presents. In fact, Israel is goaded to make such concessions by its "friends",
including (it is painful to acknowledge) the Clinton Administration, for
which a "Mid-East Peace" would be a foreign policy triumph.
Is Israeli territory not sacred? The Arabs consider
every inch of their territory as "sacred Arab soil". Mr. Sadat,
Egypt's president at the time, was handed the vast Sinai Peninsula
with its oil fields developed by the Israelis, its sophisticated military
installations, and its burgeoning cities on a silver platter. He
then went to the World Court to sue Israel for Taba one disputed
square mile that he could not bear to abandon to the hated Jews. The sainted
King Hussein of Jordan insisted on a "border modification" involving
a few acres of land before he would deign to sign a peace treaty with
Israel. The late unlamented Hafez Assad of Syria was literally begged
to accept a present of the entire Golan Heights, in return for granting
"peace" to Israel. But he walked away from the deal because
it did not include a strip of shoreline on the Sea of Galilee again,
"sacred Arab soil". It is only the Israeli Jews, to whom no
part of their country appears to be sacred, who carelessly and indifferently
toss away chunks of their very small patrimony. You may be sure that a
good portion of Jerusalem, once thought of as the "eternal indivisible
capital of Israel", will be the next peace offering.
What Israel is expected to do - to reward those who have
invaded it (for the purpose of destroying it) with territorial gifts
is unprecedented in the history of the world. Nobody has ever suggested
that the French return Alsace-Lorraine to Germany, the Czechs the Sudetenland,
or the Poles the vast swatches of Eastern Germany that they received after
World War II. The Russians laugh at the suggestion that they should return
to Japan the islands they snatched from them in the last weeks of World
War II. It is only Israel that is expected to bring such "sacrifices
for peace", a bizarre term that has been coined specifically for
application to this proposed outrage.
Only fools and wishful thinkers will believe that making
such "sacrifices" will bring peace even one step closer. On
the contrary, the more Israel allows itself to be weakened by yielding
strategic assets, the more likely are the Arabs to be encouraged to launch
the war for which they are so feverishly preparing and to attempt to finish
off the Jewish State (an intolerable thorn in their side) once and for
all.
Peace can only come about by a fundamental mind change by
the Arabs, a sincere desire to live in peace and hoped-for prosperity
with Israel. But that is not in the cards. Arab publications feature the
most outrageous stories and caricatures about Israel and about Jews. Schoolchildren
in Arab countries, including those under the Palestinian Authority, are
taught that the Jews are devils, must be destroyed, and that "all
of Palestine" (and we know what that means) must be recovered. Israel
would be foolish to make any territorial concessions at all until it can
be convinced that all Arab and Moslem countries have forsworn their enmity
of Israel and their desire to wipe it off the map. That may take a little
while. It certainly cannot be hastened by giving away big chunks of the
country.
This ad has been published and paid for by
Facts and Logic About the Middle East
P.O. Box 590359
San Francisco, CA 94159
Gerardo Joffe, President
Return to top of page>>
|
|