|
|
A Demilitarized Palestinian State
Should Israel, should the world, rely on
it?
To most people, the establishment of a Palestinian
state seems to be the indispensable outcome of the decades-long attempt
to settle the Arab/Israel conflict. Such an outcome might be desirable
between two countries that could live side-by-side in peace with
each other. The Arabs, however, have never changed their position
and are sworn to destroy the Jewish state.
What are the facts?
Israel threatened by enemies. Israel is a very small
country. Including the Golan and the “West Bank,” it is only
one-half the size of San Bernardino County in California. Israel has
for some time been in a “cold peace” with Egypt and with
Jordan. Other Arab states are still in a declared or undeclared state
of war with Israel. Iran, Moslem though not Arab, is the most determined
and deadly of them all. It lurks in the background, its foremost military
and political objective being the destruction of the state of Israel.
The Palestinian Authority (PA), the successor of the murderous
PLO, has not abandoned its core objective, namely to kill the Jews and
to destroy the State of Israel. While the latter objective is until now
beyond its reach, it has been most successful in the former. Over 1,000
Jews have been killed so far in the murderous intifada and countless
thousands have been grievously wounded. It seems almost incomprehensible
that the supposedly level-headed men who are the government of Israel
would be trustful of such people and, under whatever pressure from “the
international community,” would countenance the establishment of
a Palestinian state on its border. Despite statements to the contrary,
the PLO (and its successor PA) have still not complied with one of Israel’s
main requirements, namely that it abrogate the clauses in their covenant
that call for the destruction of Israel. Abu Mazen, though better tailored,
better barbered and better spoken than his thuggish predecessor still
pursues the old goal of destroying Israel in “stages” — first
by creating a Palestinian state, from which an allied all-out assault
against the critically vulnerable Jewish state can be launched and then,
hopefully, the deathblow delivered.
The
myth of demilitarization. The assumption that “Palestine” would
be demilitarized is not tenable. The Arab nations would not allow it,
even in the most unlikely case that the Palestinians themselves so
desired. Also, the Palestinian entity would have thousands of trained
soldiers, camouflaged as police. They could be helicoptered in minutes
to positions on the border with Israel, with armored forces from Syria
reaching them within the same night. But such mobilization of the “demilitarized” Palestine
would not be required. The weapons of preference of Arab terrorists
are the Soviet-made Katyushahs, highly effective missiles, truck-mounted
and mobile, ideal for hit-and-run raids against Israel. Israel could
not prevent them from flooding Palestine. A look at the map makes clear
that these rockets, short-range though they may be, would dominate
the heartland of Israel. Easily moved and hidden along Israel’s
new eastern borders — to be increased from less than 40 miles
in length to over 200 miles — these Katyushah rockets would rain
destruction over most of Israel. They would cover in their entirety
Israel’s narrow waist that holds 70% of the Jewish population
of the country, 70% of its industrial base, its only international
airport, and its most important military installations.
The Arabs who live in Judea/Samaria (the “West Bank”)
danced on the roofs of their homes when Iraqi Scud missiles fell on Tel
Aviv during the first Gulf War. They have continued to engage in unremitting
terror and murder against the Jews. Only incurable optimists can believe
that an “autonomous” Palestine would become a peaceful neighbor
of Israel. Foolishly, Israel has now ceded the Gaza Strip — the
invasion route since before biblical times — with Judea/Samaria
(the “West Bank”) perhaps not too far behind. With Gaza and
Judea/Samaria in the hands of its implacable and sworn enemies, it would
make the country indefensible and Israel would have laid the groundwork
for its own destruction.
Tanks, warplanes, and missiles would only be needed for
the final mopping-up process. In the meantime, mortars and Katyushahs
located on the Judean ridges — Israel’s proposed new borders – would
suffice to paralyze life and industrial and military activity in Israel.
But one can hope that the leaders of Israel clearly understand this danger
and that they will ultimately not make concessions that will endanger
the security of their country.
This ad has been published and paid for by
Facts and Logic About the Middle East
P.O. Box 590359
San Francisco, CA 94159
Gerardo Joffe, President
Return to top of page>>
|