American Aid to Israel
is a two-way street. Aid to Israel is Americas best defense
bargain. |
|
|
Iraq, the Arabs, the U.S., and Israel
Is there linkage between Kuwait and the "West
Bank?"
Iraqi aggression against Kuwait and its designs
on Saudi Arabia have startled the world. When asked to relinquish his
conquest, President Saddam Hussein said that he would consider doing so,
provided that Israel would withdraw from the administered territories
of Judea and Samaria (the "West Bank") and from the Gaza strip.
Is that a proposal that should be considered? Would such linkage be conducive
to the welfare of the United States and the rest of the world?
What are the facts?
Strategic Value. Some believe that the strategic
value of Israel had been diminished in the wake of the "luke-warming"
of the cold war with the Soviet Union. The aggression by Iraq against
Kuwait and its threatening posture against Saudi Arabia show the fallacy
of such thinking. The U.S. has committed (so far) over 100,000 personnel
and untold military assets in the area. Saudi Arabia having purchased
close to $100 billion of the world's most advanced weaponry, has been
found to be totally impotent, even before the first lunge of the Iraqi
aggressor and has asked for the protection of the United States. Kuwait,
overrun in less than 24 hours by a small contingent of the Iraqi military,
also had acquired tens of billions of dollars of sophisticated armament.
All of it was "liberated" by the Iraqis. The most sensitive
military secrets fell into enemy hands.
In order not to "offend" the Arabs, the United
States Administration has asked Israel to "lie low" in this
present conflict. Though highly classified and politically sensitive intelligence
is provided by Israel to the U.S., Israel is indeed on the sidelines.
It will in all likelihood remain in that posture unless it finds its own
security threatened. And that could very easily come about, because Hussein,
feeling cornered, may attempt an attack on Israel. He would do that in
the quite justified expectation that those Arab states that are now "allied"
with the United States would promptly switch their allegiance. Because
even though the Arabs hate each other, they are all united in their greater
hatred of the Jews.
Financial Burden. The U.S. carries by far most of
the financial burden of the Middle East action. The Administration has
decided that it is politically advisable to involve the Arab nations in
this enterprise. We thus find ourselves with such unpleasant associates
as, for example, Syria. Its president, Hafez Assad, though the mortal
enemy of Saddam Hussein, is equally unsavory. He has slaughtered his own
citizens by the tens of thousands. He is a terrorist leader specializing
in killing Americans (remember PanAm 103?), and he knows the use and value
of hostages. All these Arab countries are likely to ask for a "reward"
for their "cooperation" with the United States. And, the world
already knows what "reward" will be expected: More pressure
on Israel to yield Judea and Samaria (the "West Bank") and the
Gaza strip for a Palestinian independent state.
It is estimated that the cost of this present conflict is
on the order of $50 million per day during the non-shooting stage. The
cost is estimated to escalate to $1 billion per day if open hostilities
break out. It is well to keep these figures in mind when discussing military
aid to Israel. At present, Israel gets $1.2 billion per year in U.S. economic
aid, almost all of which is repaid to the United States as service on
debt. Israel also gets $1.8 billion per year in military assistance. Virtually
every penny of it is spent in the United States. Compared to the cost
of the present Mid-East operation, compared to the $130 billion spent
each year on the defense of Europe, and compared to the $30 billion spent
yearly in Japan/Korea, the contribution to Israel is a defense bargain.
And there is an additional "bonus:" Over 300,000 American soldiers
are stationed with NATO, over 30,000 in the Far East, and close to 100,000
by now in Saudi Arabia. But there is not a single American soldier stationed
in Israel and none will be requested. If and when the crunch comes, Israel
will know how to inflict intolerable damage on Iraq or to any other enemy
of the Judeo-Christian civilization, of which Israel is the only defender
in that part of the world.
Israel is America's only reliable ally in the Middle East.
Its undiminished strength and ability are of greatest political and military
importance to the U.S. Nothing must be done to diminish Israel's military
potential. Yielding the "West Bank" to the hostile "Palestinians,"
Saddam Hussein's fanatic supporters, would be a suicidal move for Israel
and a military catastrophe for the United States. One hundred retired
U.S. generals and admirals are agreed that Israel must retain the Jordan
River as its defense border. Those who consider Saddam Hussein's preposterous
proposition that, in exchange for Iraq's withdrawal from Kuwait, Israel
should withdraw from the "West Bank" do not understand the political
and military realities of the Middle East.
This ad has been published and paid for by
Facts and Logic About the Middle East
P.O. Box 590359
San Francisco, CA 94159
Gerardo Joffe, President
Return to top of page>>
|
|