|
|
The "West Bank" and Gaza
Should Israel withdraw from the territories?
The "Intifada," the uprising of Arab
Palestinians in Judea/Samaria (the "West Bank") and Gaza has
been going on since December of 1987. It has so far caused over 1,000
deaths. Many believe that the conflict would end if Israel were to withdraw
from the territories, cede them to the Palestinian Arabs, and allow them
to create a Palestinian state in them.
What are the facts?
End of the Arab nations' hostility toward Israel.
The suggestion that Israel should give up the territories and that good
things would flow from that is based on two assumptions, namely 1) that
the demands of the Palestinian Arabs for independence from Israel are
the source of the Arab conflict with Israel; and 2) that Israel's withdrawal
from the territories and the creation of a Palestinian state in them would
satisfy the aspirations of the Palestinian Arabs, that it would end the
hostility of the Arab nations against Israel.
Unfortunately, both of these assumptions are not in accord
with reality. The desire of the Arab nations to destroy Israel has been
unrelenting from the day of the creation of Israel, in 1948. It has given
rise to five major wars, has caused tens of thousands of casualties, and
untold destruction. The PLO, whose covenant -- never changed and never
amended -- unequivocally calls for the destruction of Israel, was founded
in 1964, long before Israel's administration in the territories. Thus,
the almost single-minded obsession of the Arabs to destroy Israel, and
not Israel's refusal to accede to the creation of a Palestinian state,
is the cause of the never-ending conflict in the area.
It is difficult for the Western mind to understand the depth
of passion on the part of the Arabs for the destruction of Israel. Among
reasonable people, most conflicts might eventually be amenable to peaceful
and rational solution. But in the Arab-Israel conflict, no such solution
is in the cards for the foreseeable future. The reason is that 300 million
Arabs consider the very existence of Israel an intolerable offense to
their sense of history and destiny. It is not Israel's administration
of the "West Bank" that is unacceptable to the Arabs; it is
the very existence of Israel. There is no reason to believe that Israel's
withdrawal and the establishment of a Palestinian state would appease
the Arabs and induce them to make peace with Israel.
What would happen if Israel ceded land again? One
can speculate as to what would be likely to happen if Israel inadvisably
or ultimately bowing to pressure were to yield the "West Bank"
to Arab control. The murderous fratricidal passions that have been played
out in Lebanon in the last fifteen years would be repeated in even more
violent form. It is an improbable expectation that a state dominated by
the murderous PLO would be the first Arab state ever to adhere to anything
resembling democratic and human rights principles or that it would be
a friend of the United States, and not an eager pawn of the Soviet Union.
The Lebanon slaughter would be shifted to the new Palestinian
state, with Israel being a more likely target of its fury. A Palestinian
Arab state on the "West Bank" would cut through Jerusalem, touch
on the suburbs of Tel Aviv, and have a long border, nine to fifteen miles
from the sea, within Israel's most thickly populated areas. Palestinian
militias, armed, not with gasoline bombs and stones, but with helicopters,
missiles, artillery and automatic weapons, would have Israeli pedestrians
within rifle range, and Zion Square in Jerusalem and Ben Gurion airport
within mortar range.
Few responsible elements in Israel's government and society
wish to annex Gaza and the territories of Judea/Samaria (the "West
Bank"). But also, hardly any responsible elements would consider
relinquishing those territories for the creation of a Palestinian state.
The Palestinian Arabs enjoy full civil rights and have been offered free
elections and full autonomy by Israel, in line with Israel's commitments
in the Camp David Accords. Moreover, Israel is ready and has always been
ready to discuss the permanent status of the territories with responsible
Palestinian representatives, three years after the implementation of the
autonomy. The situation of Israel and the territories is a bad one
no doubt about it. But the alternative to bad is not necessarily good.
In this case, at least at the present time, the alternative would likely
be a catastrophe, which, in its consequences, could even put the horrible
situation of Lebanon in the shade. Peace in the area will not come by
Israel's yielding minimum strategic depth to its mortal enemies. It can
only come about by the eventual rise of democratic governments in the
"front-line" Arab states, governments that would accept Israel's
existence and could learn to live in peaceful co-existence with it.
This ad has been published and paid for by
Facts and Logic About the Middle East
P.O. Box 590359
San Francisco, CA 94159
Gerardo Joffe, President
Return to top of page>>
|
|