The "Troubles" in Israel
Should Israel withdraw from the "West
Bank" and Gaza?
For more than six months now, the "troubles"
in Israel have been daily front page features and daily fare on the evening
television news. We read about the national aspirations of the "Palestinians."
And many thoughtful people may have come to the conclusion that peace
could come to this troubled part of the world if the Israelis were to
withdraw from Judea/Samaria (the "West Bank") and from Gaza
and if they turned these areas over to the Arabs.
What are the facts?
The occupied territories are home for Jews. It is
a fundamental error to believe that the "occupied territories"
are at the root of the problem in Palestine. When the British resigned
the Palestine mandate in 1947, the United Nations offered a partition
plan to the Jews and Arabs living in the area. The Arabs rejected that
partition plan out of hand. The Jews accepted partition into a gerrymandered
crazy quilt and even accepted the internationalization of Jerusalem. This
diminished and indefensible territory was to be the dreamed-of Jewish
homeland and the haven for the pitiful remnants of Nazi Holocaust survivors.
But the Arabs would not allow this to happen. For any "infidel"
to be in sovereignty of any piece of "sacred Arab soil" was
a religious crime that called for "jihad" holy war. Five
Arab armies attacked the Jewish State at the very moment of its birth.
They were defeated, but they managed to occupy and to stay in control
of the "West Bank," of Gaza, and of the eastern part of Jerusalem.
The Arabs were the occupiers: the Jordanians in Judea/Samaria (the "West
Bank") and East Jerusalem, and the Egyptians in Gaza.
The terror group known as the Palestinian Liberation Organization
(PLO) was founded in 1964. The goal of the PLO was obviously not to "liberate"
Judea/Samaria and Gaza, which were under Arab control, but "to wipe
Israel off the map and send the Jews into the sea." These goals and
sentiments are part of the PLO's unchanging philosophy. The PLO has always
opposed and continues to oppose any policy that does not include the destruction
of Israel or calls for the establishment of a "secular state"
in Palestine instead of Israel. One would expect that to be on the model
of Lebanon not an attractive prospect for the Jews of Israel, or
for its Arab citizens, for that matter.
In 1967, following the victorious Six-Day War, another war
that had been imposed on Israel by the Arabs, Israel assumed the administration
of Judea/Samaria and Gaza, and united the liberated city of Jerusalem
as the nation's capital. Israel's intent, declared and repeated over and
over, was to return most of these territories to Arab control, as part
of a comprehensive peace treaty. But in the Arab League Khartoum conference,
immediately following the war, the Arabs pronounced their "three
inalterable no's": no recognition, no negotiation, and no peace with
Israel. The purpose of the Arabs to "wipe Israel off the map"
was re-asserted. It has never been recanted.
People in the United States believe that conflict between
nations can be resolved or at least be kept from exploding. Even the cold
war between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. takes place in a context of relative
civility. But the enmity of the Arabs against Israel is of a different
nature altogether. For the last 40 years. the Arabs have committed themselves
almost single-mindedly to the destruction of Israel by war, by
terror, and now by mob violence, sending their women and teen-age children
to throw Molotov cocktails at Israeli civilians and soldiers.
Territorial concessions by Israel. There is yearning
for peace in Israel, a deep desire to be done with the wars that have
been pressed on it without surcease since the very day of its birth. And
Israel has proven that it is ready to make territorial concessions for
peace. That's what happened with Egypt, to which Israel returned the vast
Sinai Peninsula over 90% of the territory taken by Israel in the
Six-Day War in exchange for recognition and peace. But much greater
guarantees with responsible and immediately involved governments would
be required to induce Israel to cede any territories in Gaza and Judea/Samaria
(the "West Bank"). Because without the "West Bank,"
Israel would be militarily indefensible. It would be only nine miles wide
at its "waist." All of its major population centers, its industries,
its military installations would be within easy mortar range of enemies
on the "West Bank." Before Israel could make any concessions
at all, it would have to have ironclad guarantees. And for that to happen,
the Arabs must rethink the role of Israel in the Middle East and their
relationship to it.
An inalterable desire for destruction. The root of
the "problem" is not Israel's administration of the territories.
The root is the Arabs' inalterable desire to destroy Israel. No country
should be asked to commit national suicide in order to appease world public
opinion. No easy solution of the territorial dispute of the "West
Bank" and Gaza is possible until the Arab nations give full recognition
and acceptance to Israel and are genuinely willing to make peace and to
establish full normalization of relations. Israel is surrounded by implacable
enemies. Does anybody really expect the Israelis to turn over the strategically
crucial territories of Gaza and the "West Bank" to those who
are sworn to destroy them? Israel well remembers the example of Czechoslovakia,
which, under irresistible international pressure, turned the Sudentenland
over to Hitler's Third Reich and ceased to exist as an independent
nation just a few months thereafter.
This ad has been published and paid for by
Facts and Logic About the Middle East
P.O. Box 590359
San Francisco, CA 94159
Gerardo Joffe, President
Return to top of page>>
|