“An attack on the
Iranian nuclear installations would fall under the heading of ‘anticipatory
self-defense,’ recognized and sanctioned by international law
and by common sense.” |
|
|
The Deadly Threat of a Nuclear-Armed Iran
What can the world, what can the USA, what
can Israel do about it?
Iran’s president, Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, has declared publicly – not once, but repeatedly – that
Israel must be “wiped off the map.” That effort, the
destruction of Israel, seems to be the main goal of Iranian policy.
When Iranian missiles are paraded through the streets of Tehran,
the destination “to Jerusalem” is clearly stenciled on
them.
What are the facts?
A death wish for Israel. Ahmadinejad
and the ayatollah who is the “supreme leader” have publicly
mused that one or two nuclear bombs would obliterate Israel, but that,
though it would cause devastating damage and millions of casualties,
Iran would survive Israel’s retaliatory attack. Iran is a huge
country, with about 60 million inhabitants, so they are probably correct.
And who can doubt that those religious fanatics would not hesitate to
allow the destruction of much of their country and to sacrifice a third
or even one-half of their population in order to eliminate the hated
Jewish state? When our country was entangled with the Soviet Union in
the bitter 40-year long “cold war,” with both sides having
sufficient nuclear weapons to destroy the opponent’s country and
its people, things were kept in place by MAD – Mutually Assured
Destruction. However “evil” the leaders of the Soviet Union
(the “Evil Empire”) may have been, there was one great consolation
and assurance: They were not crazy. But the Iranians and other Muslims
are crazies, as we understand the concept. Because they take instructions
directly from Allah, who tells them to kill the Jews and other infidels,
whatever the cost.
Israel has no problem with Iran. They share no borders
and have no territorial dispute. In fact, they face common Arab enemies
and should be natural allies, as they indeed were under the Shah. Iran’s
death wish for Israel is based entirely on religious fanaticism. In contrast
even to the intractable North Koreans, the determination of the Iranians
is immutable. It cannot be changed by persuasion, by diplomacy, by sanctions
or by threats.
Once Iran is in possession of nuclear weapons, it will
not only be a deadly danger to Israel, but to all of the Middle East
and to virtually all of Europe. The flow of oil from the Middle East,
the lifeblood of the industrialized world, would be totally under its
control and so would be the economies of all nations of the world, very
much including the United States.
What is to be done? In 1981, then prime minister of Israel
Menachem Begin, being aware of Iraq’s nuclear ambitions and looming
realization of those ambitions, decided that its nuclear reactor at Osiraq
had to be destroyed. The IAF (Israeli Air Force) accomplished that in
a daring and unprecedented raid. Iraq’s nuclear capability was
eliminated in one stroke, never to rise up again. Israel had done the
world an enormous service. Had it not been for Israel’s decisive
action, the Iraqi conquest of Kuwait and, without question, also of Saudi
Arabia and its enormous oil fields, and, for that matter, of Iran, could
not have been prevented. Saddam Hussein would have been the ruler of
the world.
The solution to the deadly threat that Iran poses to the
world is obvious. Of course, diplomacy and persuasion, threats and promises,
sticks and carrots – every possible means short of military action – should
be used until it becomes clear even to the most obdurate that nothing
can deviate Iran from its chosen path of becoming a nuclear power and
to dominate the Middle East.
There is reason to believe that the people of Iran, especially
the young people, oppose the oppressive and theocratic regime of their
country and are hostile to the mullahs who control everything. But the
government has the tools of power firmly in its hands. It controls the
instruments of coercion – it can kill people and it controls the
oil money. While it would be most desirable and in the interest of the
world to be able to foment an overthrow of the Iranian regime, that is
an unrealistic and unattainable prospect.
Regrettably, there is only one solution to the terrible
dilemma confronting the world, the unacceptable danger of a nuclear-armed
Iran. The terror, the destruction and the 60 million dead of World War
II could have been prevented at several times during the Nazi regime.
But the Allied powers, under the leadership of Britain’s prime
minister Neville Chamberlain, opted for appeasement and for “peace
in our time.” We cannot afford to make that same mistake again.
The world must give Iran an ultimatum: Desist immediately from the development
of nuclear weapons; if you do not, we shall destroy the facilities that
produce them. There still is a window of opportunity to do that. That
window may close very soon. But who would do the job? The United States
would be the obvious choice. But if the United States were in accord,
Israel could do it, just as it did the job in 1981 in destroying Iraq’s
nuclear potential once and for all.
An attack on the Iranian nuclear installations would fall
under the heading of “anticipatory self-defense,” recognized
and sanctioned by international law and by common sense. Nobody really
knows for sure how far Iran is from reaching its goal — six months.
six years? The experts disagree. But if Iran is not stopped now, it may
well be too late not very long from now.
This ad has been published and paid
for by
Facts and Logic About the Middle East
P.O. Box 590359
San Francisco, CA 94159
Gerardo Joffe, President
Return to top of page>>
|
|