“The only way to
peace in this turbulent area is for the Arabs to undergo a complete
change of heart and mind. And that, if it is to happen at all, will
take a very long time.” |
|
|
“Land for Peace” (II)
Should the “West Bank,” should
the Golan be yielded?
In an earlier one of our hasbarah (educating and clarifying)
messages, following Israel’s ill-advised transfer of the vast
Sinai to Egypt, we explained the folly of the belief that “Land
for Peace” could bring about peace in the Middle East. Since
then, Israel has given up further pieces of its small land, hoping
that it would bring about peace. All these gifts of the Israeli patrimony
to its sworn enemies have been in vain.
What are the facts?
Land for Peace: a dismal failure. In 1977,
in exchange for peace and normalization of relationship with its neighbor,
Israel returned the vast Sinai Peninsula to Egypt. In retrospect, it
is clear that this decision was one of the worst mistakes that Israel
ever committed. The peace with Egypt is the coldest imaginable and it
is likely to be rescinded if, as seems possible and even likely, a new
government, similar to that of Iran, would take over in Egypt.
Always
hoping against hope, Israel abandoned the buffer zone it had established
in southern Lebanon, where it was able to protect its northern cities
and settlements from the maraudings of Hizbollah (the “Army of
God”). In order to bring about peace, and yielding to insistent
pressure of “world opinion,” Israel vacated this buffer zone.
Hizbollah and its 20,000 missiles moved right in, invaded Israel and
killed and kidnapped its soldiers. The “second Lebanese war” erupted
as a consequence. It left thousands of dead and wounded on both sides
and destroyed much of Lebanese infrastructure. Once again, “Land
for Peace” proved to be a disaster.
Ariel Sharon, until recently
prime minister of Israel, but now comatose and moribund, famously said
that “responsible statesmen do not
give away pieces of their country.” That dictum should be even
more true for Israel than for any other country, because Israel is so
small that it would sink without a trace in Lake Michigan. Still, probably
in his dotage, Sharon decided to abandon Gaza and to evict the thousands
of Israelis who had been living there for generations.
Instead of acknowledgement
and gratitude, the Gazans erupted in spasms of aggression against Israel,
showered it with missiles, invaded it through
tunnels, and killed and abducted Israeli soldiers. Once again, the trusted
formulation of “Land for Peace” had proven to be a dismal
failure.
What else is left to give away? There
remain Judea/Samaria (the “West
Bank”) and the Golan Heights. Having urged Israel to yield Gaza,
most of the world, even the enlightened leaders of our own country, pressure
Israel to yield the “West Bank” to the Palestinians. But
that would be an existential disaster for Israel. Within weeks, the Judean
ridges, which totally dominate Israel’s heartland, would be occupied
by Palestinian troops and, more than likely, also by troops of Syria,
Iran, and quite possibly also from Jordan and Egypt. A merciless bombardment
of Israeli cities, military and industrial installations, utility infrastructure
and airports would immediately ensue. Tanks and armored personnel carriers,
fighter planes and bombers, even chemical weapons would promptly materialize. “Land
for Peace” would become “Land for National Suicide.”
Syria
is Israel’s most implacable enemy, sworn to its destruction.
It is an insistent supporter of terrorism; it hosts the most vicious
Palestinian rejectionists; it is the missile supplier to Hizbollah; and
it is allied with Iran’s murderous Ahmadinejad. Still, there are
those who press for “dialog” with Syria and urge Israel to
return the Golan to this murderous regime. But that would be even more
disastrous than handing over the “West Bank” to the Arabs.
When Syria was in possession of the Golan it bombarded Israel’s
northern cities and settlements almost daily, making life intolerable.
It used the Golan three times to invade Israel. It was only the skill
and courage of the Israeli Defense Forces that in each of these cases
prevented disaster.
If Israel were to commit the folly of returning the
Golan to Syria, it would put itself in mortal danger. Together with having
handed over the “West
Bank,” Gaza being armed with heavy weapons and, in all likelihood,
Jordan and Egypt having cancelled their peace treaties, Israel would
be totally surrounded by mortal enemies whose only foreign policy objective
seems to be the destruction of Israel.
Most of the Arabs and Iran are
Israel’s implacable enemies and
don’t hesitate to proclaim their goal, namely “wiping Israel
off the map,” “driving the Jews into the sea,” or “excising
the cancer of the Zionist entity.” These formulations, which have
been repeated and confirmed for decades and which the Arabs, so far unsuccessfully,
have repeatedly attempted to implement, make it clear that no further
land that Israel might foolishly yield to the Arabs would bring peace
one step closer. The only way to peace in this turbulent area is for
the Arabs to undergo a complete change of heart and mind. And that, if
it is to happen at all, will take a very long time.
This ad has been published and paid
for by
Facts and Logic About the Middle East
P.O. Box 590359
San Francisco, CA 94159
Gerardo Joffe, President
Return to top of page>>
|
|