make a donation

Why Donate to FLAME?

By supporting FLAME, you help fund our ads in national media, like U.S. News and World Report, The New York Times, The Nation, The National Review, The American Spectator, The Washington Times National Weekly, and others. You help publish our messages in Jewish publications, both in the U.S. and in Israel, among them The International Edition of the Jerusalem Post. Finally, your donation helps us publish our messages monthly in over fifty small-town newspapers, all across the United States and Canada.

Facts and Logic About
the Middle East
P.O. Box 590359
San Francisco, CA 94159
(415) 356-7801

March 31, 2009

Anti-Zionism or anti-Semitism — they're both born of hate

Dear Friend of FLAME:

We have all been witnesses to another vicious cycle of Israel bashing, which has continued months after Israel's retaliatory actions in Gaza. We at FLAME prefer to base our opinions on "facts and logic," and we clearly see through biased and agenda-driven reporting. Unfortunately, this puts us in the minority.

Just recently the media jumped all over a story on the allegedly "immoral" actions committed by IDF soldiers (which naturally turned out to be lacking solid evidence). Also, a recent horrific cartoon appearing on the New York Times website (among others) reminded us of the anti-Semitic propaganda of the Nazis.

It is clear what the goal is here: Delegitimization of the state of Israel and its fundamental right to exist. Judea Pearl concludes in his well-written piece below, "It is anti-Zionism, then, not anti-Semitism that poses a more dangerous threat to lives, historical justice and the prospects of peace in the Middle East." (We would ask whether they are not one in the same.)

And it is anti-Zionism that has become "en-vogue" among many of the world's academic institutions (including here in the United States) and among many members of the world media. Case in point is the recent (5th annual) "Israel Apartheid Week" that occurred at 42 university campuses worldwide.

The very word "apartheid" is meant, again, to delegitimize Israel. Apartheid is the system of ensuring rule of the minority over the majority, referencing what happened in South Africa. Clearly this is not the case in Israel.

Israel meets three requirements giving it the right to exist. One, Jews have a undeniable historical connection to the land of Israel. This simply cannot be disputed. Two, there was a clear transfer of authority, resulting from the UN Partition Plan (Resolution 181). And three, there was international recognition of the state of Israel after it declared independence. Which countries in the world actually meet these three requirements? The truth is that most states have come into being as a result of wars and other atrocities, including the United States.

The media's response to criticism of their Israel coverage is that vocal Zionists are trying to stifle debate on the Jewish state and her actions. So now we aren't even allowed to speak up when Israel/Zionism bashing occurs in the media on a daily basis?

This is extremely ironic since often it is the media that write a story based on Palestinian "eye-witnesses" or jumps on the bandwagon of another unverifiable rumor demonizing Israel and then complains when Israel supporters dare to speak up. Talk about stifling debate!

The claim that anti-Zionism is NOT an extreme form of bigotry and anything but an attempt to deny the Jewish people the right to their homeland is absurd. Jeff Jacoby described this in a January article in the Boston Globe:

"Imagine someone vehemently asserting that Ireland has no right to exist, that Irish nationalism is racism, and that those who murder Irishmen are actually victims deserving the world's sympathy. Who would take his fulminations for anything but anti-Irish bigotry? Or believe him if he said that he harbors no prejudice against the Irish?"

Anti-Zionism is no different than anti-Irish bigotry, or bigotry against any other nation. Unlike Dr. Pearl, as far as we're concerned, delegitimization of the Jewish state is anti-Semitism, plain and simple. But whatever you call anti-Zionism, it's deadly dangerous to Israel and to those of us who take comfort in the Jewish homeland.

Best regards,

Dave Nogradi
FLAME Hotline Contributor


To learn more about false accusations of immoral actions committed by the IDF please read an article written by Herb Keinon recently posted on our website, called "Analysis: The crucial morality of the IDF's cause". Keinon exposes the biased nature of the story first broken by Israel media. Please review it and other "Outstanding Articles on the Middle East" posted on our website. Most of all, if you agree that this kind of public relations effort on Israel's behalf is critical, I urge you to support us. Remember: FLAME's powerful ability to influence public opinion comes from individuals like you, one by one. I hope you'll consider giving a donation now, as you're able---with $500, $250, $100, or even $18. (Remember, your donation to FLAME is tax deductible.) To donate online, just go to Now more than ever we need your support to ensure that Israel gets the support it needs, while so many bash her.

Is anti-Zionism hate?
by Judea Pearl, Los Angeles Times, March 15, 2009

In January, at a symposium at UCLA (choreographed by the Center for Near East Studies), four longtime Israel bashers were invited to analyze the human rights conditions in Gaza, and used the stage to attack the legitimacy of Zionism and its vision of a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians.

They criminalized Israel's existence, distorted its motives and maligned its character, its birth, even its conception. At one point, the excited audience reportedly chanted "Zionism is Nazism" and worse.

Jewish leaders condemned this hate-fest as a dangerous invitation to anti-Semitic hysteria, and pointed to the chilling effect it had on UCLA students and faculty on a campus known for its open and civil atmosphere. The organizers, some of them Jewish, took refuge in "academic freedom" and the argument that anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism.

I fully support this mantra, not because it exonerates anti-Zionists from charges of anti-Semitism but because the distinction helps us focus attention on the discriminatory, immoral and more dangerous character of anti-Zionism.

Anti-Zionism rejects the very notion that Jews are a nation -- a collective bonded by a common history -- and, accordingly, denies Jews the right to self-determination in their historical birthplace. It seeks the dismantling of the Jewish nation-state: Israel.

Anti-Zionism earns its discriminatory character by denying the Jewish people what it grants to other historically bonded collectives (e.g. French, Spanish, Palestinians), namely, the right to nationhood, self-determination and legitimate coexistence with other indigenous claimants.

Anti-Semitism rejects Jews as equal members of the human race; anti-Zionism rejects Israel as an equal member in the family of nations.

Are Jews a nation? Some philosophers would argue Jews are a nation first and religion second. Indeed, the narrative of Exodus and the vision of the impending journey to the land of Canaan were etched in the minds of the Jewish people before they received the Torah at Mt. Sinai. But, philosophy aside, the unshaken conviction in their eventual repatriation to the birthplace of their history has been the engine behind Jewish endurance and hopes throughout their turbulent journey that started with the Roman expulsion in AD 70.

More important, shared history, not religion, is today the primary uniting force behind the secular, multiethnic society of Israel. The majority of its members do not practice religious laws and do not believe in divine supervision or the afterlife. The same applies to American Jewry, which is likewise largely secular. Identification with a common historical ethos, culminating in the reestablishment of the state of Israel, is the central bond of Jewish collectivity in America.

There are of course Jews who are non-Zionists and even anti-Zionists. The ultra-Orthodox cult of Neturei Karta and the leftist cult of Noam Chomsky are notable examples. The former rejects any earthly attempt to interfere with God's messianic plan, while the latter abhors all forms of nationalism, especially successful ones.

There are also Jews who find it difficult to defend their identity against the growing viciousness of anti-Israel propaganda, and eventually hide, disown or denounce their historical roots in favor of social acceptance and other expediencies.

But these are marginal minorities at best; the vital tissues of Jewish identity today feed on Jewish history and its natural derivatives -- the state of Israel, its struggle for survival, its cultural and scientific achievements and its relentless drive for peace.

Given this understanding of Jewish nationhood, anti-Zionism is in many ways more dangerous than anti-Semitism.

First, anti-Zionism targets the most vulnerable part of the Jewish people, namely, the Jewish population of Israel, whose physical safety and personal dignity depend crucially on maintaining Israel's sovereignty. Put bluntly, the anti-Zionist plan to do away with Israel condemns 5 1/2 million human beings, mostly refugees or children of refugees, to eternal defenselessness in a region where genocidal designs are not uncommon.

Secondly, modern society has developed antibodies against anti-Semitism but not against anti-Zionism. Today, anti-Semitic stereotypes evoke revulsion in most people of conscience, while anti-Zionist rhetoric has become a mark of academic sophistication and social acceptance in certain extreme yet vocal circles of U.S. academia and media elite. Anti-Zionism disguises itself in the cloak of political debate, exempt from sensitivities and rules of civility that govern inter-religious discourse, to attack the most cherished symbol of Jewish identity.

Finally, anti-Zionist rhetoric is a stab in the back to the Israeli peace camp, which overwhelmingly stands for a two-state solution. It also gives credence to enemies of coexistence who claim that the eventual elimination of Israel is the hidden agenda of every Palestinian.

It is anti-Zionism, then, not anti-Semitism that poses a more dangerous threat to lives, historical justice and the prospects of peace in the Middle East.

Judea Pearl is a professor at UCLA and the president of the Daniel Pearl Foundation.

If you'd like a printer-friendly, text version of this newsletter click the button below.

How many times have you heard someone lament that Israel doesn't have good public relations? By supporting FLAME, you help one of the world's most powerful information efforts to spread the truth about Israel and the Middle East conflict. Please note that because FLAME is a non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation, your donation is tax-deductible.

If you know of a friend or colleague who would appreciate learning more Facts and Logic About the Middle East, please forward this issue of the FLAME HOTLINE to them using the link below.

If you have received this issue of the FLAME HOTLINE from a friend or colleague and you'd like to subscribe, please use the link below.

Our Ads and Positions | Donate | Our Letters to Editors | Our Acquisition Letters
FLAME's Purpose | Subscribe to Hotline Alerts | Home

©2009 FLAME. All rights reserved. | Site Credits | Contact Us

You are receiving this email because you have requested news, facts and analysis about Israel and the Mideast conflict.