hotline header

An e-newsletter delivering updates and analysis on current issues about Israel and the Middle East conflict

October 30, 2012

Why don't the Islamists like us—why will they always hate us? Because like it or not, we are their enemies.

Dear Friend of FLAME:

Our small (unpaid) two-person staff at FLAME will split our votes---one for Obama and one for Romney---in next week's Presidential election.

One thing we agree on, though, is the bankruptcy of the current administration's Middle East policy. We're also not so sure Governor Romney has that much better a handle on the situation.

President Obama's failure has been the mistaken notion that if you make nice with the Islamists---give them respect, distance yourself from Israel, give a stirring pro-Muslim speech in Cairo---they will be reasonable and they will see the virtues of economic and political cooperation.

This obviously hasn't happened---U.S. overtures have been snubbed as the Islamists seize more power and more personal freedoms. Michael Totten commented in the Wall Street Journal that President Obama "was naïve . . . It's not his fault that the Middle East is immature and unhinged politically. Nobody can change that right now."

Mr. Obama's greater mistake, however, is that he refuses to define our enemy as terrorism carried out by radical Islamists. White House counterterrorism chief John Brennan said in 2010 that the administration does not "describe our enemy as jihadists or Islamists because jihad is holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam meaning to purify oneself or one's community." He neglected to add that jihad also means holy war or to mention that an Islamic jihad is currently struggling to purify the Middle East community of all Jews and most of its Christians.

Mitt Romney, while he does speak of radical Islam and jihadists being the main problem, seemed almost as navive in last week's foreign policy debate, when he said, "We're going to have to put in place a very comprehensive and robust strategy to help the world of Islam . . . reject this violent extremism."

But right now the world of Islam---even the man on the street---doesn't want gender equality, religious tolerance and the rule of law. Their votes prove that most want Sharia law, which rejects all those and most other core Western values, and they want to destroy Israel. Many also support violent extremism as a strategy for bringing the non-Muslim world to heel.

This week's FLAME Hotline article hits this nail on the head. Commentator Barry Rubin urges us to stop denying the obvious. Islamists and many other Arabs actually have it right: America is their enemy, because America will never support the values and policies they hold dear. Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs.

As usual, Professor Rubin bars no holds in his outspoken analysis. I think you'll find it enlightening, as only a blinding flash of the obvious can be.

As usual, I urge you to pass this call for a dramatic Middle East policy change along to friends, colleagues, and fellow congregants using the "send to a friend" button at the bottom of this email, or using the buttons above to share it via social media. I guarantee that you and they will be glad to you did.

Thanks for your continued support of Israel, and thank you for your support of FLAME.

Best regards,

Jim Sinkinson
Vice President
Facts and Logic About the Middle East – FLAME


I think you'll agree that another topic we need to keep front and center in the mainstream media is the looming, deadly threat of a nuclear Iran. That's why FLAME recently issued a powerful hasbarah (public relations) message, "Iran and Nuclear Weapons: What does the world, what does Israel have to fear?" We published this position paper in media reaching more than 10 million people and delivered it to all U.S. Senators and Representatives. Ask yourself: If FLAME doesn't keep the pressure on concerning Iran's threats to the U.S. and Israel and its dangerous progress toward a nuclear bomb, who else will tell this story in mainstream media? If you agree that these kinds of forceful advocacy efforts on behalf of Israel and the United States are essential, I urge you to support us. Remember: FLAME's ability to influence public opinion comes from individuals like you, one by one. I hope you'll consider giving a donation now, as you're able---with $500, $250, $100, or even $18. (Remember, your donation to FLAME is tax deductible.) To donate online, just go to Now more than ever we need your support to ensure that Israel gets the support it needs---from the U.S. Congress, from President Obama, and from the American people.


As of today, nearly 10,000 Israel supporters receive the FLAME Hotline at no charge every week. It keeps them up to date on the top news of the week and gives them greater confidence in discussing Middle East issues with friends and colleagues. Won't you join us to start receiving these timely updates: Just go to free subscription.

They got it right: America is their enemy
The Islamists realize that their vision and values will never align with those of the United States. To try to persuade them otherwise is folly . . . and a lie.
By Barry Rubin, Jerusalem Post, October 21, 2012

One of President Barack Obama's main themes is to convince Middle East Islamists that America is not their enemy. But the reason this strategy never works is that the radicals know better. The United States is their enemy.

No amount of sympathy, empathy, economic aid, apology or appeasement will change this fact. Nor did such efforts succeed in making either Obama or the United States popular in such circles and the tens of millions of people influenced by them. The only thing surprising about all of this is that so few "experts" and politicians seem to comprehend it.

There are a number of reasons why this is true, though many people mistakenly think they must find just one factor that explains this reality. The causes of this enmity include:

• American policies. True, the United States has supported Israel and also many Arab regimes over the years – including countries like Morocco, Tunisia, post- Gaddafi Libya, Egypt, pre-Hezbollah Lebanon, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, post-Saddam Iraq and the United Arab Emirates. The Islamists are equally unhappy with the US support for the Palestinian Authority.

In short, US support for any non-radical regime makes radicals angry and will always do so.

So what if the United States is nice to radical or Islamist regimes? Will that help? No. The radicals still keep their goals – which include throwing US influence out of the region and overthrowing its allies – no matter what Washington tries to do to please them. In the context of their ideology, they interpret US concessions as signs of weakness which thus invite them to become even more militant and aggressive.

In Libya and Iraq, the governments have been pretty much directly installed by America. Thus, anyone who wants to overthrow those governments has a strong vested interest in hating and attacking Americans. The assassination of the ambassador to Libya wasn't an accident or the result of a video but the inevitable and logical outcome of the political situation there.

As for Israel, giving that country less help would not change the radical view. Only if the United States had the same policy as Hamas, Hezbollah and the Muslim Brotherhood might it be forgiven. Merely putting more space between the United States and Israel, to paraphrase Obama's stated intention, won't do it. Even brokering a comprehensive peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, which isn't going to happen of course, won't help.

On the contrary, the radicals – especially Hamas, its Egyptian backers and Iran – would go into a frenzy of denunciation and attempt to destroy the arrangements, the failure of which would then be blamed on America. In the Middle East, peacemakers aren't blessed, they're assassinated.

Ultimately, to do away with these problems US policy would actually have to help Islamist regimes to power, give them money and whitewash their extremism.

Sounds familiar, doesn't it? And we can all see the results have not been good, either in terms of US interests or even in terms of US popularity.

American values and culture. While the mere fact that a highly secular, largely hedonistic and generally free lifestyle is practiced in the United States raises the Islamists' ire, there is far more involved here.

The United States is the world's leading exporter of culture, regarding everything from T-shirts to films and democratic ideas. As such, it inevitably subverts traditional Islamic society and poses as a rival alternative to the kind of system the Islamists want to impose. There is simply no way around this conflict. It is not an imagined one and remains in effect no matter what political policy a US government follows.

America as an example to their own society. If the United States succeeds with a "Satanic" standpoint, how can Islamists persuade their people that Allah is on their side? America must be seen to fail, either through propaganda or by its actual collapse, at least in terms of the Middle East. Otherwise, the United States will remain an attractive model for many, prompting everything from immigration to political philosophy.

Obviously a distinction can be drawn between, on one hand, winning over the radicals and their supporters, and winning over ordinary Arabs. The problem is that most of the latter group gets its worldview, news and spin from radical sources, be they Islamists, militant Arab nationalists or traditionalist clerics.

In other words, no matter what the United States does it will not be interpreted – especially by the masses – based on the US government's statements or intentions but through the filter of a very different culture and worldview that has a good deal of hostility in it and is prone to xenophobia and conspiracy theories.

By the same token, to be hated the United States doesn't have to do anything wrong. It just has to be itself and pursue its own legitimate interests. This is a point that many Americans – including "experts" and leaders – seem to have great difficulty in grasping. What you say is not what someone else hears; what you do is not what someone else sees.

Finally, the radicals – which include a large portion of governments, political movements, teachers, clerics and journalists – will deliberately do everything they can to discredit the United States and foment popular hatred against it. That includes using anything they can, be it a video, the slaying of Osama bin-Laden, accusations of atrocities, and so on, whether the specific accusations are true or false, consciously misinterpreted or misunderstood on ideological grounds.

They will never run out of reasons to hate America or ammunition for their efforts to convince others to do so. One conclusion that can be drawn from this assessment is that the traditional arsenal of diplomacy – credibility, deterrence, power – is what's important, not popularity. The same principle applies to allies, of course, who must feel that their friend or patron is strong and reliable.

Such an approach has not been the one pursued during the past four years. As for the next four years, the vote count is not in yet.


How many times have you heard someone lament that Israel doesn’t have good public relations? By supporting FLAME, you help one of the world’s most powerful information efforts to spread the truth about Israel and the Middle East conflict. Please note that because FLAME is a non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation, your donation is tax-deductible. Click here to make a donation.


If you have received this issue of the FLAME HOTLINE from a friend or colleague and you'd like to subscribe, please click here.

Our Ads and Positions | Donate | Our Letters to Editors | Our Acquisition Letters | FLAME’s Purpose | Subscribe to Hotline Alerts | Home

©2012 FLAME. All rights reserved. | Site Credits | Contact Us