hotline header

An e-newsletter delivering updates and analysis on current issues about Israel and the Middle East conflict

September 11, 2012

Israel's Best Defense Against Perennial Attacks by the International Community Is . . . the Facts

Dear Friend of FLAME:

The great Christian theologian, Reinhold Niebuhr observed in 1967 that Israel is "a strategic anchor for a democratic world . . . and an asset to America's national interests in the Middle East."

While that fact is much truer today than it was 45 years ago, you wouldn't know it by the raucous, divided voice vote during the Democratic convention on whether declaring Jerusalem the capital of Israel should be on the party's platform. But this is nothing new. You wouldn't know that Israel is a light unto all nations either, judging by the unrelenting, vicious criticism and outright attacks the Jewish state has suffered since its birth in 1948.

We know that much of the hostility toward Israel on the international stage reflects pure anti-Semitism---these critics don't like or trust Jews and will lie about them, and Israel, no matter what---so we should accept that there's little we can do to change these bigots' minds.

But we at FLAME---and I suspect you as well---believe there are still millions of people who sincerely seek the truth about the world's issues and who wish to make their judgments fairly and dispassionately using fact-based logic. This is the view taken by Dr. Michael Curtis in his recent book, "Should Israel Exist? A Sovereign Nation Under Attack by the International Community."

Curtis is a thoughtful, brilliant writer, and he's created a convincing, fact-packed book---a treatise for anyone who cares to discover the truth about Israel and who wants to communicate that truth to others. Although "Should Israel Exist?" makes an ironclad case for Israel's right to be, it is neither a rant nor a raving polemic. Curtis is a Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Rutgers University, and he backs up his soberly drawn arguments with a copious bibliography citing 314 other works.

On the other hand this book powerfully and passionately makes the case for Israel's existence---by systematically reviewing the history of Zionism and Palestine, the enemies of Zionism (mostly Arabs, but also Nazis), and Israel's dogged struggle for survival through every one of its 64 years. In fact, "Should Israel Exist?" so comprehensively covers the issues and facts surrounding Israel's existence---from accusations of racism, apartheid, colonialism and occupation to disputes over settlements, Jewish peoplehood and Israel's security needs---that it's quite literally the only book you need on this subject.

This week, to give you some useful facts contained in "Should Israel Exist?," as well as a flavor of Michael Curtis's lucid writing, we've included some excerpts from the book in place of an article.

I hope you agree that the excerpts below give you strong ammunition in your conversations with others about Israel on the world stage. But I hope they also inspire you to acquire the book (it's available through Amazon). Finally, I hope you'll take two minutes to help Israel's cause by passing this week's issue along to your email list. Just use the "send to a friend" button at the bottom of this email and paste in your email list, or use the buttons above to share it via social media.

Thanks for your continued support of FLAME, and thank you for your support of Israel.

Best regards,

Jim Sinkinson
Vice President, FLAME

P.S.

FLAME has been making the logical, factual case against use of the word "occupation" for years, as evidenced by our hasbarah (public relations) effort---"Myths about the Arab-Israeli Conflict: Is "occupation" the cause of this conflict?"---which we published in media reaching more than 10 million people, and delivered to all U.S. Senators and Representatives. It's one more example of FLAME's determined efforts to tell the truth about the enemies of Israel (and the U.S.). Ask yourself: If FLAME doesn't tell the truth in mainstream media about the false myth of "occupation," who else will do it? If you agree that these kinds of outspoken advocacy efforts on behalf of Israel and the U.S. are essential, I urge you to support us. Remember: FLAME's ability to influence public opinion comes from individuals like you, one by one. I hope you'll consider giving a donation now, as you're able---with $500, $250, $100, or even $18. (Remember, your donation to FLAME is tax deductible.) To donate online, just go to http://www.factsandlogic.org/make_a_donation.html. Now more than ever we need your support to ensure that Israel gets the support it needs---from the U.S. Congress, from President Obama, and from the American people.

P.P.S.

As of today, nearly 10,000 Israel supporters receive the FLAME Hotline at no charge every week. It keeps them up to date on the top news of the week and gives them greater confidence in discussing Middle East issues with friends and colleagues. Won't you join us to start receiving these timely updates: Just go to free subscription.

Should Israel Exist?
A Sovereign Nation Under Attack by the International Community
(Selected Excerpts from the Book)

By Michael Curtis, Balfour Books, Published January 2012

On the atrocities the world ignores even as it criticizes Israel:

"Consider the outrage expressed by international bodies over actions by Israeli authorities compared with the response, either minimal or nonexistent, to those in an endless list of actions in other countries in recent years: the 20,000 civilians, part of the total of 70,000, killed by Sri Lankan troops fighting against the Tamil Tigers; the estimated 100,000 Uzbeks who in June 2010 fled ethnic violence in Kyrgystan; the invasion of Georgia by Russia in 2008; the "cleansing" of Bahais in Iran; the killing in Syria of Kurds celebrating the festival of Nowruz and the deprivation of the human rights, including travel, property and work, of the Kurds in Syria who constitute ten per cent of the country, but are regarded as foreigners (ajanib) and about 300,000 of whom have been stripped of Syrian citizenship; the liquidation of the Assyrian minority in Iraq; the massacre in February 1982 of at least 20,000 by Syrian bombing of its citizens in Hama; the killing of Kurds and machine gunning in July 2008 of prisoners in Saidnaya jail; the murder of over thirty Lebanese leaders and personalities in Syria since the 1980s; the killing by Turks of over 30,000 Kurds in Anatolia and northern Iraq and the refusal of Turkey to recognize the existence of a separate Kurdish identity; the expulsion of Americans in 2010 by Morocco for Christian proselytizing; discrimination against Berbers in North Africa; the slaughter of Christians by Muslims in the Sudan and Nigeria; the killing of over 2 million in Darfur; the murder of over 700 people by Boko Haram, the Islamist militant group in Nigeria . . ." (Curtis's long list of ignored atrocities by other groups and nations continues on for another page)

On the role and positions of the United Nations:

"The United Nations has greatly changed since its formation by fifty-one nations immediately after the end of World War II. Today, non-Western countries, many who seem to be automatically hostile to Israel, constitute about two-thrids of the total of 192 members. Changes in the composition of the UN Security Council, which includes non-permanent members from Africa and Asia, have meant more opportuntities for voices critical of Israel to be heard. It is conspicuous that the Security Council has never condemned any Arab state for military or terrorist attacks against Israel. With constant resolutions condemning Israel, it is apparent that the UN is not acting, acccording to its charter, as "a center for harmonizing the actions of nations." It is a sad reality that the United Nations has become a battleground for political advantage for the non-Western bloc, rather than the epitome of international peace and justice."

On accusations by the Palestinians and others that Israel is racist:

"[The] National Covenant of the PLU adopted in 1964 and amended in 1968, states . . . that Zionism is 'racist and fanatic in its nature; aggressive, expansionist and colonialist in its aims; and Fascist and Nazi in its ends and means.' The charge by the Arabs against Israel of racism is doubly ironic. It is the Arabs who deny Jews, who have a unique connection with a historic homeland, the right of self-determination, while claiming the same right for themselves or for the Palestinians. Palestinians have attempted to deny the Jewish connection with the Western Wall and the Temple Mount in Jerusalem and other historical sites and have even vandalized some of them, such as Joshua's tomb in the village of Timnat Heres, by covering it with graffiti in Arabi. Moreover, this denial of Jewish self-determination has been made by people in countries and territories which have exhibited the most egregious forms of discrimination and persectuation. Even more, Arab media and Islamic political rhetoric has resonated with the routine use of blood libel images, of Jews as vampires, with a deluge of hatred against 'Zionists.'"

On the historical rejection by the Arabs of peace with Israel:

'It was self-defeating for the Arab leaders meeting at a summit conference on September 1, 1967, in Khartoum to declare, in response to the Israeli proposal for a compromise solution, that the basic principles to which the Arab states adhered were 'no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiation with Israel and ahderence to the rights of the Palestinian people in their own country,' thus preventing any compromise agreement on territory after the Six-Day War. There must be few, if any, cases in history where a defeated party, after hostilities, refused to negotiate about territory it wanted to regain, even demanding unconditional surrender by the victors. Relating the story of lost opportunities by Arab leaders to negotiate a peaceful settlement of the Arab-Israeli conflict is a minor cottage industry. The Arab leadership, in its refusal of any change for compromise, seemed, as Abba Eban remarked, to 'have written failure into its birth certificate.'"

On the issue of Israeli settlements in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria):

"When Britain withdrew as Trustee of the Mandate for Palestine in May, 1948, the Trust was transferred to the United Nations without change. After the 1967 war, Cyrus Vance, then US Secretary of State, On July 29, 1967 asserted 'it is an open question as to who has legal right to the West Bank' . . . The initial problem is the fact that the areas now known as Israel and the West Bank were only provinces of the Ottoman Empire, rather than states, either Israeli or Palestinian, with their own sovereignty . . . On the controversial question of Jewish settlements, no clear answer is available in international law. The Hague Regulations do not apply to the question of civilian settlements in the disputed territories. Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention does forbid 'individual or mass forcible transfers' and the 'transfer of parts of (the occupant's) civilian population.' This may apply to government movement of population, but Israeli governments have not aimed at displacement of the existing population as a prelude to future annexation. The Article does not appear to be applicable to the establishment of voluntary settlements on an individual basis, nor on their location, if the underlying purpose is security, public order or safety, as long as the settlements do not involve taking private property."

On the international boycotts and political and propaganda warfare that have been conducted against Israel:

"Troubling though these challenges have been, Israel, essentially changing in the mid 1980s from a quasi-socialist society, with flourishing kibbutzim and cooperatives, and a powerful trade union movement, the Histadrut, to a market economy, has in spite of the lack of local markets in the surrounding area, the scarcity of physical resources, and the boycotts against it, registered remarkable successes. This has been shown by its entrepreneurial culture in attracting venture capital and in the number of start-up enterprises per capita, and by its general efforts in shaping technological change through innovation, improvisation and willingness to take risks. Israel has registered 7,600 patents in its history; the twenty-one Arab states have registered 700 in the same period. Recently, Israel has had the second largest number of start-up companies in the world, after the US, and the largest number of Nasdaq-listed companies outside North America. The Hebrew University in Jerusalem is ranked no. 21 among world universities in computer science, outranking Cambridge University, which is no. 30, and Yale University no. 31 . . . Israel has been prominent in, and concentrated on developing software, computer and telecommunications components, all enterprises that can overcome the boycotts and restrictions put on its exports, especially those of large manufactured goods."

DONATE

How many times have you heard someone lament that Israel doesn’t have good public relations? By supporting FLAME, you help one of the world’s most powerful information efforts to spread the truth about Israel and the Middle East conflict. Please note that because FLAME is a non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation, your donation is tax-deductible. Click here to make a donation.

SUBSCRIBE TO THE FLAME HOTLINE

If you have received this issue of the FLAME HOTLINE from a friend or colleague and you'd like to subscribe, please click here.

Our Ads and Positions | Donate | Our Letters to Editors | Our Acquisition Letters | FLAME’s Purpose | Subscribe to Hotline Alerts | Home

©2012 FLAME. All rights reserved. | Site Credits | Contact Us